SECTION IV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3332, 3335, 3336 AND 3337 OF 2014

Satyam Educational Society & Ors. ..Appellants

VERSUS-

Bharat Singh & Ors.etc. etc. ...Respondents

OFFICE REPORT FOR PREFINAL HEARING

Office Report is prepared as per Circular No.F.41/Judl./2008 dated 17th December, 2008:

(a) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3332 OF 2014

There are five Respondents. Respndent Nos. 1, 4 and 5 are represented by M/s. Sanjay Jain, K.M. Gupta and R.P. Goyal, Advocates respectively. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have been served with Notice at SLP stage but have not chosen to enter appearance.

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3335 OF 2014

There are four Respondents. Respndent Nos. 3 and 4 are represented by M/s. K.M. Gupta and R.P. Goyal, Advocates respectively.

Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have been served with Notice at SLP stage but have not chosen to enter appearance.

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3336 OF 2014

There are four Respondents. Respndent Nos. 1 to 3 and 4 are represented by Dr. Monika Gusain and R.P. Goyal, Advocates respectively.

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3337 OF 2014

There are four Respondents. Respndent Nos. 1 to 3 and 4 are represented by Dr. Monika Gusain and Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocates respectively.

• (b) Original Record has been returned to High Court vide Circular dated 03.12.2014.
• (c) Not applicable.
• (d) Not applicable.
• (e) No application for substitution is pending.
• (f). The matters above mentioned were placed before the Ld. Registrar on 24th June, 2015, when the following order was passed:

"Await statement of case from the parties. List on 25.8.2015."

Neither Counsel for Appellant nor Counsel for the Respondent in the appeal have filed Statement of case despite this Registry notice dated 19.06.2015 in C.A. Nos. 3332, 3335 & 3336/2014 and 05.09.2014 in C.A. No. 3337 of 2014. In terms of Rule 32, Sub Rule-2 of S.C.R.2013, it is presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special leave to appeal statement of case. If the Respondent has not filed statement of case within the stipulated time as provided in Sub Rule-1 of S.C.R. 2013, it is presumed that the respondent does not desire to lodge statement of case in the appeal.

(g) Not applicable.

Dated this the 21st day of August, 2015.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to:

• 1. Mr.Uttara Babbar, Advocate 112, C.K. Daphtary Chambers, New Delhi01.
• 2. Mr. Sanjay Jain, Advocate 201, Dayanand Vihar, Delhi92.
• 3. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Advocate B9, Sagar Apartments 6, Tilak Marg, New Delhi.
• 4. Dr. Kailash Chand, Advocate Library 2, SCI., New Delhi.
• 5. Dr. Monika Gusain, Advocate 15, Lawyers Chambers, SCI., New Delhi.
• 6. Mr. R.P. Goyal, Advocate 4, Lawyers Chambers, SCI., New Delhi.
• 7. Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Advocate 414, Delhi High Court, New Delhi3.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

suantak/c2