Union Territory Of J And K vs. Guchhu Ram
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Bela M. Trivedi, Hon'ble Prasanna B. Varale
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed on ground of delay [and merits]
Listed On:
28 Jan 2025
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
10941/2025,10944/2025,10943/2025
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.11+12
COURT NO.11
SECTION XII-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No. 29217/2024
[Arising out of impugned judgment and order dated 22-05-2023 in RFA No. 20/2023 passed by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu]
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
GUCHHU RAM
Respondent $(s)$
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R.; IA No. 10941/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING, IA No. 10943/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS and IA No. 10944/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
WITH
Diary No. 29223/2024 (XII-A) IA NO. 10082/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING, IA NO. 8685/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS and IA No. 10083/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
Diary No. 29224/2024 (XII-A) FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 14709/2025, FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS ON IA 14710/2025, IA No. 14710/2025 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS and IA No. 14709/2025 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
Date: 28-01-2025 These matters were called on for hearing today.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA B. VARALE
For Petitioner(s): Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR Mr. Astik Gupta, Adv.
For Respondent(s) :
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. $\mathbf{1}$
There is a delay of 321 days occurred in filing the present $\mathbf{2}$ .
SLP. We are not inclined to condone the delay, without any satisfactory justification. However, we have examined the case on merits also. There is no good ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.
3. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed on both, on the ground of delay as well as on merits.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(GEETA JOSHI) (MAMTA RAWAT) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)