R. Kanagaraj vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble S.V.N. Bhatti
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Leave Granted / Rule NISI / Appeal Admitted
Listed On:
8 Jan 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Civil Appeal No(s). 4372/2023
J. JOHN DEVAKUMAR & ANR. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
THE GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU & ORS. Respondent(s)
([FOR FURTHER DIRECTION.]...[HEARD BY: HON'BLE S. RAVINDRA BHAT AND HON'BLE ARAVIND KUMAR, JJ. ]
(I.R. and IA No.98095/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.98094/2022-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS and IA No.98096/2022-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES, IA No. 100702/2023 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS, IA No. 161539/2022 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION and IA No. 106662/2022 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/ FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 01-08-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
For Appellant(s) | Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Sr. Adv. |
---|---|
Mr. N Subramaniyan, Adv. | |
Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, AOR | |
Mr. Jatin Bhardwaj, Adv. | |
Ms. Tanya Shrivastava, Adv. | |
For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanjay R. Hegda, Sr. Adv. Mr. D.kumanan, AOR Mr. Sheikh F Kalia, Adv. Mrs. Deepa. S, Adv.
Dr. Joseph Aristotle S., AOR Mr. Sabarish Subramanian, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
On 12.07.2023, this Court had heard learned counsel for the parties and reserved this appeal for judgment. It
emerges from the records that a proceeding having intimate
connection with one of the issues urged in these
Digitally signed by NEETA SAPRA Date: 2023.08.03 17:43:50 IST Reason:
Signature Not Verified
proceedings (validity of G.O. No. 155 of 2015 dated 13.08.2015 amended in the year 2017) was dismissed and special leave petition challenging the High Court's order(s) is/are pending before this Court. Since that government order is consequential and has close connection with the controversy raised, it would be appropriate that the present appeal(s) is/are placed before the Bench seized of SLP(C) Nos. 17269-17271 of 2022, SLP(C) No. 17267-17268 of 2022 and SLP(C) No. 16508-16509 of 2022.
Accordingly, the present appeal is released from the category of 'CAV' (reserved).
List before the appropriate Bench (which granted leave in SLP(C) Nos. 17269-17271 of 2022 & Ors.).
(NEETA SAPRA) (BEENA JOLLY)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)