Kishan Chand vs. Rajasthan High Court At Jodhpur

ITEM NO.50 COURT NO.12 SECTION X

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 936/2018

DINESH KUMAR GUPTA & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT FOR JUDICATURE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No.112366/2018-EX-PARTE STAY )

WITH

W.P.(C) No. 967/2018 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.115665/2018-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.115666/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES)

Date : 26-11-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY

For Petitioner(s)	Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Adv.
	Mr. Annam D. N. Rao, AOR<br>Mr. A. Venkatesh, Adv.
	Mr. Sudipto Sircar, Adv.
	Mr. Rahul Mishra, Adv.

Mr. Mukul Rohatgi,Sr. Adv. Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Karthik S.D., Adv. Mr. John Mathew, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. Abhinav Mukerji, AOR Ms. Bihu Sharma, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Garg, Adv. Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Adv.

Mr. Rohit K. Singh, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

On 20.09.2018, this Court had issued notice.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners

that even after the order dated 20.09.2018 certain promotions have been effected.

Learned counsel appearing for the High Court, however, submitted that those promotions were not based singularly on the provisional list. At the request of the learned counsel for the High Court, time of two weeks is granted so that an appropriate reply responding to all submissions could be filed.

Mr. Vijay Hansaria, learned senior counsel submitted that in the present proceedings none of the promotee officers have been made parties. He further submitted that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the two persons who would like to be impleaded in the matter. Let an appropriate application be filed within a week's time.

List the matters on 14th December, 2018.

(NEETU KHAJURIA)	(SUMAN JAIN)
COURT MASTER	BRANCH OFFICER

2