Mennonite Brethren Property Associattion Of India Pvt. Ltd vs. Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble S.V.N. Bhatti
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
8 Jul 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.33
COURT NO.3
SECTION XII-A
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 16177/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14-07-2023 in WP No. 11746/2023 passed by the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad)
M/S MENNONITE BRETHREN PROPERTY ASSOCIATION OF INDIA PVT. LTD.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL & ORS. Respondent $(s)$
No.145135/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THF TMPUGNFD $(IA)$ JUDGMENT and IA No.145136/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ No.145134/2023-PERMISSION $\mathbf{TO}$ FILE ADDITIONAL DATES $\quad\text{and}\quad$ DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date: 07-08-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Asad Hussain, Adv. Mr. Arpit Shukla, AOR Ms. Gargi Srivastava, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Amit K. Nain, AOR Mr. PBA Srinivasan, Adv. Mr. V. Aravind, Adv. Mr. Sumit Swami, Adv. Ms. Pooja Kumari, Adv. Ms. Anupama Dhurve, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
HyperNot Verified We do not find any good ground and reason to interfere with impugned judgment and hence the special leave petition is dismissed. However, to cut short the controversy, we believe that both the sides claiming that they have a right to appear for $M/s$ .
Mennonite Brethren Property Association of India Pvt. Ltd. can be heard by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT).
We hope and trust that the petition/application under Section 17 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) will proceed expeditiously as the same is pending for the last four years and preferably will be decided within a period of four months from today.
Recording the aforesaid, the special leave petition is dismissed.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(DEEPAK GUGLANI) (R.S. NARAYANAN) AR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR