Maharashtra Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs. Pune Municipal Corporation

\212ITEM NO.103 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal 8762/2016 DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD AND ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS SOCIETY FOR PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT AND BIODIVERSITY (SPENBIO) AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with office report) WITH C.A. No. 9070/2016 (With Office Report) Date : 15/11/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr.Rahul Mishra,Adv. Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr.Gudipati G.Kashyap,Adv. Ms.Priyanka Das,Adv. Mr.D.S.Mahra,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No.8762/2016 As per tracking report, all the respondents have been served, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. C.A. No. 9070/2016 The respondent No.8 has already filed the counter affidavit. ⬠¦ ......2 ITEM NO.103 -2- AC8762/2016 The respondent Nos.6 & 7 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks. As per tracking report, the respondent Nos.1-5 have been served, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. However, Mr.Ravinder Kumar, Ld.counsel undertakes to file vakalatnama for the respondent No.2. He seeks and is given one week's time to file vakalatnama and four weeks time to file the counter affidavit. List the matter again on 16.12.2016. (M V RAMESH) Registrar

SB