Maharashtra Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs. Pune Municipal Corporation

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH

Civil Appeal 8762/2016

DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD AND ANR. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

SOCIETY FOR PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT AND BIODIVERSITY (SPENBIO) AND ORS. Respondent(s)

(with office report)

WITH C.A. No. 9070/2016 (With Office Report)

Date : 15/11/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

• For Appellant(s) Mr.Rahul Mishra,Adv. Mr. Annam D. N. Rao,Adv.
• For Respondent(s) Mr.Ravindra Kumar,Adv. Mr.Gudipati G.Kashyap,Adv.

Ms.Priyanka Das,Adv. Mr.D.S.Mahra,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

C.A. No.8762/2016

As per tracking report, all the respondents have been served, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules. Signature Not Verified

C.A. No. 9070/2016 Digitally signed by SUSHMA KUMARI

BAJAJ Date: 2016.11.16 14:14:17 TLT Reason:

The respondent No.8 has already filed the counter affidavit.

…......2

The respondent Nos.6 & 7 shall be at liberty to file the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks.

As per tracking report, the respondent Nos.1-5 have been served, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. However, Mr.Ravinder Kumar, Ld.counsel undertakes to file vakalatnama for the respondent No.2. He seeks and is given one week's time to file vakalatnama and four weeks time to file the counter affidavit.

List the matter again on 16.12.2016.

(M V RAMESH) Registrar

SB