State Through The Inspector Of Police vs. Sujakhani
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
11 Sept 2017
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
<u>REVISED</u> COURT NO.3
ITEM NO.6
SECTION II-C
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
CRL.MP.NO.85018/2017 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal $(Crl.)$ No(s). 7453/2015
STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, Petitioner(s) UCHIPULI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT
VERSUS
SUJAKHANI
$Respondent(s)$
(FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT)
Date: 11-09-2017 The matter was called on for hearing today.
$CORAM :$
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA [IN CHAMBERS]
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Ms. Mahalakshmi, Adv. Ms. Sujatha Bagadhi, Adv.
- For Respondent(s) Mr. Pratyusg Raj, Adv. Mr. Anu Gupta, AOR
- For Applicant(s) $Mr. B. Balaji, Adv.$ Mr. S. Kumar, Adv. Mr. A.S. Vairawan, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
In view of the fact that the High Court, vide impugned order has granted compensation to the applicants and they are the necessary parties to the special leave petition, the application for impleadment to implead the applicants as party respondents is allowed.
Learned counsel for the applicants is granted four weeks' time file Counter affidavit. Date: 2015.21<br>12:59:19 TUT
(SAPNA BISHT) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT
(MADHU NARULA) BRANCH OFFICER
| ITEM NO.6 | COURT NO.3 | SECTION II-C |
|---|---|---|
| S U P R E M E<br>C O U R T<br>O F<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | I N D I A | |
| (Crl.)<br>No(s).<br>7453/2015 | CRL.MP.NO.85018/2017 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal | |
| STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,<br>Petitioner(s)<br>UCHIPULI POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM<br>DISTRICT | ||
| VERSUS | ||
| SUJAKHANI | Respondent(s) | |
| (FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT) | ||
| Date : 11-09-2017 The matter was called on for hearing today. | ||
| CORAM :<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA<br>[IN CHAMBERS] | ||
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR<br>Ms. Mahalakshmi,Adv.<br>Ms. Sujatha Bagadhi,Adv. |
For Respondent(s) Mr. Pratyusg Raj,Adv. Mr. Anu Gupta, AOR
For Applicant(s) Mr. B. Balaji,Adv. Mr. S. Kumar,Adv. Mr. A.S. Vairawan,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
In view of the fact the the High Court, vide impugned order has granted the compensation to the applicants and they are the necessary parties to the special leave petition. Therefore, the application for impleadment to implead the applicants as party respondents is allowed.
Learned counsel for the applicants is granted four weeks' time to file Counter affidavit.
(SAPNA BISHT) (MADHU NARULA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER