Government Of India Represented By Its Joint Secretary vs. C. Sai Vishnuvardhan

LITEM NO.57 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 19-34 OF 2006 BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH THE A.P.COMMN.FOR BACKWARD CLASSES Appellant (s) VERSUS B.ARCHANA REDDY & ORS. Respondent(s) (With office report) Date: 27/10/2010 These Appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Nirada Das, Adv. Ms. C.K. Sucharita,Adv. Mr.V. Pattabhi Ram, Adv. Mr. G.N. Reddy, Adv. For Respondent(s) M/S. Lawyer'S Knit & Co,Adv. Mr. Indra Makwana ,Adv Mr. K.N. Rai ,Adv Mr. R.C. Kohli ,Adv Mr. Goodwill Indeevar ,Adv Mr. D. Mahesh Babu ,Adv Mr. Abhijit Sengupta ,Adv Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad ,Adv Mr. Praveen Kr. Pandey, Adv. Mr. C.S.N. Mohan Rao ,Adv UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Office report says that the application filed by the appellant for substituted service is restricted for some respondents only and there are other unserved respondents for whom no steps are taken by the appellant till date. When appellant is publishing the notice for some of the respondents, there is no difficulty to add the name and number of unserved respondents in such public notice. Item No.57 -2- The interim application for substituted service is, therefore, allowed, as prayed for, for all the unserved

respondents in the concerned civil appeals.

However, let there be a fresh notice for all the unserved respondents being respondent No.1 in C.A. No.33, respondent No.2 in C.A No.27 and respondent No.4 in C.A. No.24/2006 with additional dasti notice.

Appellant is directed to confirm the service upon

the state authorities directly against proper acknowledgment which is to be filed on record with proper affidavit. For dasti notice against private respondents, since they were petitioners before the First Court and since impugned order is in their favour and as there is a stay in favour of appellant, appellant has to find them out by proper means and to serve dasti notices upon them. However, appellant fails to find them out then appellant is permitted to serve such dasti notices through the nearest civil court or trial court even by affixing the same and to file proper affidavit as per proforma provided under the Code of Civil Procedure.

List gain on 15.12.2010.

(S.G. SHAH) REGISTRAR

rd