Chamundi Hotel Private Limited vs. Vandita Sharma
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
LISTED ON 11.04.2014 COURT NO. 8 ITEM NO.2
SEC.IVA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Interlocutory Application Nos. 15-16,17-18, 19-20 & 21-22 (Application for directions, exemption from filing official translation and stay) IN CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 3309-3310 of 1997 WITH Contempt Petition Nos. 188-189/2013 in Civil Appeal No. 3309- 3310/1997 and Contempt Petition 237/2014 in Civil Appeal No. 3309- 1997 AND Interlocutory Application Nos. 3-4 (Application for directions and exemption from filing official translation) IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3306 of 1997 AND Interlocutory Application No. 13 (Application of directions) IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3303 OF 1997 AND Interlocutory No. 2 (Application for impleadment/respondent) IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3305 of 1997 AND Interlocutory Application No. 5 (Application for directions) IN CIVIL APPEAL No. 3308 of 1997 WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3307 AND 3351 OF 1997 Indrakashi Devi And Ors. ETC. ...Appellants -VERSUS-State of Karnataka & Anr. ETC. ...Respondent
OFFICE REPORT
The matters above mentioned were listed before the Hon'ble Court on 10.02.2013 with an office report dated 08.02.2014 when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:-
"I.A. NOS.14-15 (APPLN. FOR SUBSTITUTION | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AND EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) IN C.A. | |||||
NO.3303/1997 | AND | I.A. | NO.2-3 | (APPLN. | FOR |
SUBSTITUTION AND EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)IN | |||||
C.A. NO.3351/1997 |
For the reasons stated in the applications, these are allowed.
On the request of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are adjourned by four weeks, to be listed on a non-miscellaneous day."
It is submitted that Mr. Satish Madiyal, Advocate has on 13.04.2013 filed an application for impleadment/respondent in Civil Appeal No. 3305/1997 and after curing the defects same has been registered as I.A. No. 2 and placed with appeal paper books.
It is further submitted that Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi, Advocate for the appellant has on 07.03.2014 filed in C.A. No. 3309/1997 additional objection to the report of local inspection concluded on 19.01.2013 by the Dy. Commissioner, Bangalore Urban District (of I.A. No.13 in Civil Appeal No. 3303/1997) and same has been included in the paper books.
It is lastly submitted that Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi, Advocate has on 07.03.2014 filed Contempt Petition in C.A. No. 3309/1997 on behalf of the appellant no. 1 viz Indrakashi Devi for deliberate and defiant violation of order of status quo passed on 30.04.1997 and order dated 25.01.2001 passed in I.A. No. 3 in C.A. No. 3310 of 1997 and the same has been registered as Contempt Petition No. 237 of 2014. The Contempt Petition Nos. 188-189 of 2013 already filed in C.A. No. 3309-3310/1997 by Mrs. Lalitha Kaushik, Advocate are pending in these matters.
The applications, contempt petition and appeals above mentioned are listed before the Hon'ble Court with this office report.
Dated this the 7th day of April, 2014
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
COPY TO: Mr. S.N. Bhat, Advocate. MR. S.R. Hedge, Advocate. Ms. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi, Advocate. Mrs. Lalitha Kaushik, Advocate. M/s. Suresh A. Shroff & Co., Advocate. Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, Advocate. Mrs. Prabha Swami, Advocate Mr. T. Harish Kumar, Advocate Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocate
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
SK/-