Jaya Talakshi Chheda vs. The State Of Maharashtra Ministry Of Home Affairs Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
18 Sept 2017
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.63 COURT NO.3 SECTION IIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PETITION(S) FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CRL.) NO(S). 7097/2017 (ARISING OUT OF IMPUGNED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 04-09-2017 IN CRLAPP NO. 646/2017 IN CRA 1012/2013 PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY)
JAYA TALAKSHI CHHEDA PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA RESPONDENT(S) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 92568/2017 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 92570/2017)
Date : 18-09-2017 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
| For Petitioner(s) | Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv. | |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Rama D. Pawde, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Subodh S. Patil, AOR |
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
perused the relevant material.
Exemption from filing certified copy of the
impugned order and O.T. is granted.
Issue notice, returnable in two weeks.
Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
Liberty is also granted to serve the notice through the learned Standing Counsel of the State of Maharashtra.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to apprise the Court as to how immediate is the need for the surgical procedure advised for the petitioner. However, having regard to the prayer for interim relief we direct that the operation of the order of the High Court dated 4th September, 2017 passed in Criminal Application No.646 of 2017 in Criminal Appeal No.1012 of 2013 shall remain stayed for a period of two weeks.
[VINOD LAKHINA] [ASHA SONI] AR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER