Shika Mohan vs. The State Of Kerala
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
11 Aug 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)…………... Diary No(s). 29006/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-03-2023 in WA No.1679/2022 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam)
SHIKA MOHAN & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF KERALA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No.145789/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.145784/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.145787/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.145782/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..))
WITH
Diary No(s). 27166/2023 (XI-A)
(IA No.149857/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.149858/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.149856/2023- DELETING THE NAME OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT)
Item 46
Diary No(s). 26920/2023
(IA No.153337/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.153333/2023-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.153341/2023-DELETING THE NAME OF PETITIONER/RESPONDENT)
Date : 11-08-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
Date: 2023.08.11 17:28:55 IST Reason:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Haris Beeran, Adv.<br>Mr. Azhar Assees, Adv. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Radha Shyam Jena, AOR | |
| Mr. P. S. Sudheer, AOR | |
| Mr. Bharat Sood, Adv. | |
| Mr. Rishi Maheshwari, Adv. | |
| Ms. Anne Mathew, Adv. | |
| Ms. Miranda Solaman, Adv. | |
| For Respondent(s) |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
1. Permission to file special leave petitions is granted.
2. Delay condoned.
3. Applications (IA No.149856/2023 & IA No.153341/2023 &) for deletion of proforma respondents are allowed.
4. Cause title be amended accordingly.
5. Issue notice.
6. Tag with SLP(C) No.9566/2023.
7. Meanwhile, the petitioners, who are provisionally appointed teachers may not be relieved, provided that there are sufficient vacancies for appointment of specially abled candidates. It goes without saying that the directions issued earlier to complete the process of appointment of specially abled candidates shall continue without disturbing the appointment of the petitioners.
(ARJUN BISHT) (PREETHI T.C.)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)