Bishnu Priya Mohanty vs. The State Of Odisha

ITEM NO.6+31 Court 3 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XI-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 20178- 20179/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29-10-2021 in WA No. 401/2021 29-10-2021 in CONTC No. 1378/2017 passed by the High Court Of Orissa At Cuttack)

JASHOBANTA BARAL & ORS. Petitioner(s)

Reason:

VERSUS

SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF ORISSA & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) (IA No. 5311/2022 - APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION IA No. 160048/2021 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) WITH SLP(C) No. 20319-20320/2021 (XI-A) (FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES ON IA 161433/2021 IA No. 161433/2021 - PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES) SLP(C) No(s).40-41/2022 (IA No.468/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ) Date : 04-02-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Bharat Sangal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pravat Kumar Jena, Adv. Mr. Surya Narayan Patnaik, Adv. Mr. Samyadeep Chatterjee, Adv. Ms. Babita Khushwaha, Adv. Mr. Nagarkatti Kartik Uday, AOR Mr. Suresh Chandra Tripathy, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashok Parija, AG Mr. Gaurav Khanna, AOR Mr. Arnav Behera, Adv. Digitally signed by NEETU KHAJURIA Date: 2022.02.05 13:27:18 IST Signature Not Verified

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

We decline to interfere in these special leave petitions. The High Court has rightly noted that no contempt action can be initiated on the basis of the fact situation, referred to in the contempt petition.

If the petitioner has any other remedy available, it is open to the petitioner(s) to pursue the same.

The special leave petitions are dismissed accordingly.

Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)