Lathika K. N vs. Kerala Veterinary And Animal Science University

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Arun Mishra
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:4 Sept 2015
CNR:SCIN010288672015

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24808-24809/2015 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16/07/2015 in WA No. 1373/2015,16/07/2015 in WA No. 1290/2015 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam) SINDHU T.C. & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE KERALA VETERINARY AND ANIMAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY & ORS. ETC Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T.) With SLP(C) No. 25266 of 2015 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) With SLP(C) No. 25335 of 2015 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and interim relief and office report) Date : 04/09/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Huzefa Ahmedi, Sr.Adv. Mr. Sajith. P Warrier,Adv. Ms. Nazia Hasan, Adv. Mr. Sidhartha Dave, Adv. Mr. Sajith P. Warrier, Adv. Mr. R.K. Singh, Adv. Mr. Sidhartha Dave, Adv. Mr. Kumar Gaurav, Adv. Mr. Hari Kumar V., For Respondent(s) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Sukhbir Paul Kaur Date: 2015.09.08 Mr. Roy Abraham, Adv. 17:22:17 IST Reason: Ms. Reena Roy, Adv. Ms. Seema Jain, Adv. Mr. Himinder Lal,Adv. -2- UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

è ITEM NO.37+67 COURT NO.10 SECTION XIA

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Issue notice.

Some of the selected candidates have entered caveat

and on their behalf Mr. Roy Abraham, learned counsel is appearing. Four weeks' time is allowed to file counter affidavit.

Issue notice to other respondents in the special leave petitions as also on the prayer for interim relief returnable within four weeks.

The University in their counter affidavit must explain as to why in spite of giving undertaking to the High Court that weightage will be given to the number of years of service rendered by the petitioners, the same has not been complied with.

COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S.

[INDU POKHRIYAL] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR]

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(21) - 10 Nov 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 23 Nov 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(19) - 21 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(17) - 9 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(18) - 9 Sept 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(14) - 29 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 29 Jul 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 29 Jul 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 6 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 6 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 17 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 17 Mar 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 17 Mar 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 3 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 3 Feb 2016

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 3 Feb 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 26 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 26 Oct 2015

Office Report - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 26 Oct 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 4 Sept 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 4 Sept 2015

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing