The State Of Tripura The State Of Madhya Pradesh Represented By The Secretary To The Govt. Of Tripura vs. M. S. Frieght Carriers(India) Pvt. Ltd. Represented By Its Manager And Duly Constituted Attorney Sri Somik Kr. Chowdhary S/O Kalipada Choudhary R/O Vill Hospital Road West Agartala Distt. West Tri

SECTION-III

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NOS. 10837,10839,10842,10843,10844,10845,10846,10848,13326,13328,13329,13330,13331,13335 ,13336,13337,13338,13339,13340,13341,13342,13343,13344,13345,13346,13347 and 13350 OF 2013 AND INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 1 (Application for condonation of delay in filing the SLP)

State of Tripura & Ors. ...PETITIONERS

-VERSUS-

M/s. M.S. Freight (India) Pvt. Ltd. ...RESPONDENT

OFFICE REPORT

The office report in the matters above-mentioned was listed before the Registrar Court on 7th August, 2013, when the following order was passed:-

"It is seen that in SLP(C) Nos.10837, 10839, 10842, 10843, 10844 and 10848/2013 Mr.Amit Kumar has filed on behalf of the sole respondent in each of the case.

However, the seal fixed on the vakalatnama shows that the name of the respondent is M.S.Freight Carriers (India) Pvt.Ltd. though the respondent is M.S. Freight (India)Pvt.Ltd. Ld.counsel for the respondent is directed to clarify, whether it is a mistake or whether the Company has undergone a change of name. File counter affidavit also within four weeks.

In all other remaining cases, await return of notice of the unserved respondents. The served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit.

.

List the matter on 7.10.2013.�

-2-

SLP (C)Nos.10837, 10839, 10842, 10843, 10844 and 10848 of 2013:-

It is submitted that Mr.Amit Kumar, Advocate for sole respondent in all the matters have not filed counter affidavit and he has also not clarified the change of name of respondent company so far.

SLP (C)No.10845 of 2013

It is submitted that neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from the sole respondent so far.-

SLP (C)No.10846 of 2013

It is submitted that there are 2 respondents. No one has filed vakalatnama/ appearance on behalf of the respondent No.1 though served with notice. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from respondent no.2 so far.

SLP (C)Nos.13326, 13339 & 13347 of 2013

It is submitted that there are 4 respondents common in all the matters. No one has filed vakalatnama/ appearance on behalf of the respondent No.1 though served with notice. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from respondent nos.2 to 4 so far.

SLP (C)Nos.13328 & 13346 of 2013

It is submitted that there are 4 respondents common in both the matters. Mr.Abhijat P.Medh, Advocate for Respondent no. 1 in both the matters has not filed counter affidavit so far. No one has vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 4 though served with notice. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from respondent nos.2 to 3 so far.

-3-

SLP (C)Nos.13329 & 13341 of 2013

It is submitted that there are 4 respondents common in both the matters. No one has filed vakalanama/appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 and 3 though served with notice. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from respondent nos.2 and 4 so far.

SLP (C)Nos.13330 & 13331 of 2013

It is submitted that there are 4 respondents common in both the matters. Neither A.D. cards nor unserved covers containing the notice has been received back from respondent nos.1 to 4 so far.

SLP (C)Nos.13335, 13336 & 13342 of 2013

It is submitted that there are 4 respondents common in all the matters. Mr.Abhijat P.Medh, Advocate for Respondent no. 1 in all the matters has not filed counter affidavit so far. No one has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of Respondent No. 3 though served with notice. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from respondent nos.2 and 4 so far. SLP (C)Nos.13337, 13338, 13343 & 13345 of 2013

It is submitted that there are 4 respondents common in all the matters. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, Advocate for respondent no.1 in SLP (C) No.13345 of 2013 has not filed counter affidavit so far. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from respondent nos.2 to 4 so far. SLP (C)Nos.13340 & 13344 of 2013

It is submitted that there are 4 respondents common in all the matters. No one has filed vakalatnama/appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos.3 and 4 though served with notice. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from respondent nos.1 and 2 so far.

-4-

SLP (C)No.13350 of 2013

It is submitted that no one has filed valakatnama/appearance on behalf of sole Respondent though served with notice.

The office report in the matters above-mentioned is listed before the Registrar Court for orders.

Dated this the 5th day of September, 2013.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to: Mr. Gopal Singh, Advocate, 20A, Lawyers Chamber.

Mr.Abhijat P.Medh, Advocate

Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate ASSISTANT REGISTRAR