Jitinder Singh vs. Land Acquisition Collector Ludhiana Improvement Trust
AI Summary
This Supreme Court Registrar's order in a land acquisition appeal highlights procedural delays where respondents 1 & 3 failed to appear despite notice, and both sides, including appellant and respondent 2, missed the deadline for filing statements of case. Consequently, the matter is now slated for listing before a higher bench, underscoring the common hurdles in the appellate process.
Case Identifiers
Petitioner's Counsel
Respondent's Counsel
eCourtsIndia AITM
Brief Facts Summary
This record of proceedings pertains to Civil Appeal No. 9651/2014, with a connected C.A. No. 9652/2014, heard by the Registrar's Court on May 11, 2016. The appellants are Jatinder Singh and Ors. and respondents are Land Acquisition Collector and Ors. It was noted that service of notice was complete on respondent Nos. 1 and 3, but no appearance was made on their behalf. Furthermore, both the counsel for the appellant and counsel for respondent No. 2 failed to file the statement of case within the prescribed statutory period.
Timeline of Events
Civil Appeal No. 9652/2014 (main case in JSON) filed in Supreme Court.
Civil Appeal No. 9651/2014 & 9652/2014 registered in Supreme Court.
Notices served on Respondent Nos. 1 & 3.
Statutory period for filing statement of case by appellant and Respondent No. 2 elapsed.
Hearing before Registrar Court; procedural defaults noted.
Key Factual Findings
Service of notice is complete on Respondent Nos. 1 & 3.
Source: Current Court Finding
No one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos. 1 & 3.
Source: Current Court Finding
Counsel for the appellant failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period.
Source: Current Court Finding
Counsel for Respondent No. 2 failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period.
Source: Current Court Finding
Primary Legal Issues
Secondary Legal Issues
Petitioner's Arguments
The order indicates that the Ld. counsel for the appellant failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period. No specific arguments were presented.
Respondent's Arguments
The order indicates that respondent Nos. 1 & 3 did not appear despite notice, and Ld. counsel for respondent No. 2 failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period. No specific arguments were presented.
Court's Reasoning
The Registrar observed that service was complete on respondent Nos. 1 & 3 who did not appear, and that counsel for the appellant and respondent No. 2 failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period. Based on these procedural defaults, the matters were ordered to be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
- Strict Adherence to Procedure
Impugned Orders
Specific Directions
- 1.Matters to be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
Precedential Assessment
Non-Binding (Procedural)
This is a procedural order by a Registrar, not a substantive judgment from a bench of judges. It deals with case management rather than legal principles.
Tips for Legal Practice
Legal Tags
Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
13 Oct 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ª ITEM NO.99 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal No(s). 9651/2014 JATINDER SINGH AND ORS Appellant(s) VERSUS LAND ACQUISTION COLLECTOR AND ORS Respondent(s) WITH C.A. No. 9652/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report) Date : 11/05/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1 & 3, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Ld.counsel for the appellant and the respondent No.2 have failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period. Viewed thus, the matters shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2016.05.12 15:44:59 TLT Reason:
(M V RAMESH) Registrar
rules.