Jitinder Singh vs. Land Acquisition Collector Ludhiana Improvement Trust
AI Summary
In a critical procedural step for a Supreme Court Civil Appeal concerning a land acquisition dispute, the Registrar's Court noted that both the appellant and a respondent failed to file their statements of case within the statutory period. This order highlights the strict adherence to court rules and directs the case to be listed before the Hon'ble Court for further proceedings, signifying potential delays due to non-compliance.
Case Identifiers
Petitioner's Counsel
Respondent's Counsel
Advocates on Record
eCourtsIndia AITM
Brief Facts Summary
This order pertains to Civil Appeal No(s). 9651/2014 and 9652/2014, titled Jatinder Singh and Ors. versus Land Acquisition Collector and Ors., heard by the Registrar Court of the Supreme Court of India on May 11, 2016. The Registrar noted that service of notice was complete for Respondent Nos. 1 & 3, but they did not appear. Furthermore, both the counsel for the appellant and Respondent No. 2 failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period.
Timeline of Events
Civil Appeals (9651/2014 & 9652/2014) filed in the Supreme Court.
Notice served on Respondent Nos. 1 & 3; appellant and Respondent No. 2 failed to file statement of case within statutory period.
Appeals called for hearing before the Registrar.
Key Factual Findings
Service of notice is complete on Respondent Nos.1 & 3.
Source: Current Court Finding
No one has entered appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 & 3.
Source: Current Court Finding
Ld. counsel for the appellant and the respondent No.2 have failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period.
Source: Current Court Finding
Primary Legal Issues
Secondary Legal Issues
Petitioner's Arguments
The arguments are not detailed in this procedural order, but it is implied that the petitioner's side is attempting to pursue the appeal despite having failed to file their statement of case within the statutory period.
Respondent's Arguments
The arguments are not detailed. It is noted that counsel for Respondent No. 2 also failed to file the statement of case. Respondent Nos. 1 & 3, despite complete notice, did not enter an appearance.
Court's Reasoning
The Registrar's Court noted that service of notice was complete on Respondent Nos. 1 & 3, yet no one appeared for them. Crucially, both the counsel for the appellant and Respondent No. 2 failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period. Given these procedural defaults, the Court decided that the matters must be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules for further directions.
- Strict Adherence to Procedure
Impugned Orders
Specific Directions
- 1.Matters shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
Precedential Assessment
Non-Binding (Procedural)
This is a Registrar's procedural order addressing a routine default in filing, rather than laying down a substantive legal principle.
Tips for Legal Practice
Legal Tags
Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
13 Oct 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.99 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH
Civil Appeal No(s). 9651/2014
JATINDER SINGH AND ORS Appellant(s)
VERSUS
LAND ACQUISTION COLLECTOR AND ORS Respondent(s)
WITH
C.A. No. 9652/2014 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)
Date : 11/05/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
For Appellant(s)
Mr. Satish Kumar,Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Ritesh Khatri,Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.1 & 3, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Ld.counsel for the appellant and the respondent No.2 have failed to file the statement of case within the statutory period. Viewed thus, the matters shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2016.05.12 15:44:59 TLT Reason: Signature Not Verified
(M V RAMESH) Registrar
SB