Moolchand Chaudhary vs. Saransh Ghiya

ITEM NO.97 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION XV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. SURAJIT DEY

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 26549/2014

MOOLCHAND CHAUDHARY Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SARANSH GHIYA AND ORS Respondent(s) (with interim relief and office report)

Date : 29/01/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Shadan Farasat,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Ms. Archana Pathak Dave,Adv. M/s Manoj Swarup & Co.,Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

The Ld. Advocate, Ms. Nidhi Jaswal, appearing on behalf of Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Advocate-on-Record submits that despite filing of the vakalatnama and Memo of Appearance in respect of respondent Nos.2 and 4, the name of the Ld. Counsel has not been reflected in the Cause List. Registry to update the database by including the name of the Ld. Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 4 hereinafter the name should be reflected in the Cause List. As prayed for, two weeks' time is granted to the Ld. Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 4 to file counter affidavit. Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2015.02.02 17:01:51 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

The Ld. Counsel for respondent No.1 is also at liberty to file counter affidavit, if any, within two weeks.

None appears on behalf of respondent No.3. However, as last opportunity, two weeks' time is granted to file counter affidavit, if any.

List again on 16.3.2015.

(SURAJIT DEY) Registrar