The State Of Tripura vs. Purbanchal Banijya Vikas& Ors.

¦ ITEM NO.64 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION III S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).10837/2013 STATE OF TRIPURA & ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS M/S. M.S. FREIGHT (INDIA) P.LTD. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and prayer for interim relief and office report )) WITH SLP(C) NO. 10839 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 10842 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 10843 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 10844 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 10845 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 10846 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 10848 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13326 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13328 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13329 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13330 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13331 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13335 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13336 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13337 of 2013 (With office report) contd.....2 ITEM NO.64 -2- SLP(C) NO. 13338 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13339 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13340 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13341 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13342 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13343 of 2013 (With office report)

SLP(C) NO. 13344 of 2013

(With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13345 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13346 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13347 of 2013 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13350 of 2013 (With office report) Date: 07/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mrs.Shubhra Rai,adv. Mr. Gopal Singh,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.Atul Kumar,adv. Mr. Amit Kumar,Adv. Mr.Manoj,adv. Ms.Aparna Sinha,adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R It is seen that in SLP(C) Nos.10837, 10839, 10842, 10843, 10844 and 10848/2013 Mr.Amit Kumar has filed on behalf of the sole respondent in each of the case. Contd....3 ITEM NO.64 -3-

However, the seal fixed on the vakalatnama shows that the name of the respondent is M.S.Freight Carriers (India) Pvt.Ltd. though the respondent is M.S. Freight (India)Pvt.Ltd. Ld.counsel for the respondent is directed to clarify, whether it is a mistake or whether the Company has undergone a change of name. File counter affidavit also within four weeks.

In all other remaining cases, await return of notice of the unserved respondents. The served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit.

List the matter on 7.10.2013.

SB