Harisharan Dwivedi vs. The State Of Chhattisgarh
AI Summary
The Supreme Court has adjourned a Special Leave Petition (Criminal) challenging a Chhattisgarh High Court order. This procedural delay allows for a pending application before a lower court to be decided, indicating ongoing complexities in the criminal proceedings involving Harisharan Dwivedi and the State of Chhattisgarh.
Case Identifiers
Petitioner's Counsel
Respondent's Counsel
Advocates on Record
eCourtsIndia AITM
Brief Facts Summary
A Special Leave Petition (Criminal) filed by Harisharan Dwivedi & Ors., challenging a final judgment and order dated July 6, 2023, passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh in WPCR No. 718/2021, was listed before the Supreme Court. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel requested an adjournment due to an application pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Marwahi, Chhattisgarh, which is anticipated to be decided in early February 2025. The Supreme Court granted the adjournment.
Timeline of Events
High Court of Chhattisgarh case (WPCR No. 718/2021) initiated.
High Court of Chhattisgarh passed final judgment and order in WPCR No. 718/2021.
Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 9160/2023 filed in Supreme Court.
Supreme Court heard the matter; petitioners' counsel requested adjournment.
Application before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Marwahi, Chhattisgarh, is expected to be decided.
Key Factual Findings
An application filed by the petitioners is pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Marwahi, Chhattisgarh.
Source: Current Court Finding/Recited from Petitioner Pleading
The pending application is likely to be decided in the first week of February, 2025.
Source: Current Court Finding/Recited from Petitioner Pleading
Primary Legal Issues
Secondary Legal Issues
Petitioner's Arguments
Counsel for the petitioners sought an adjournment stating that an application filed by the petitioners is pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Marwahi, Chhattisgarh, and is expected to be decided in the first week of February 2025.
Court's Reasoning
The Court noted the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners regarding the pending application in the lower court and consequently decided to adjourn the matter.
- Pragmatism in Litigation Management
Impugned Orders
Specific Directions
- 1.The matter stands adjourned.
- 2.List the matter after four weeks.
Precedential Assessment
Non-Binding (Procedural)
This is a routine procedural order granting an adjournment and does not lay down any new legal principle or interpret any statute, therefore it has no precedential value.
Tips for Legal Practice
Legal Tags
Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
After Week/Month/Vacation
Before:
Hon'ble Hrishikesh Roy, Hon'ble S.V.N. Bhatti
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
List After (Weeks) [4]
Listed On:
21 Jan 2025
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
147027/2023,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.8
COURT NO.4
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 9160/2023
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06-07-2023 in WPCR No. 718/2021 passed by the High Court of Chhatisgarh at <pre>Bilaspurl</pre>
HARISHARAN DWIVEDI & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
Respondent(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ORS.
(IA No. 147027/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
Date: 21-01-2025 This matter was called on for hearing today.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.V.N. BHATTI
For Petitioner(s):
Mr. Sameer Shrivastava, AOR Ms. Yashika Varshney, Adv. Ms. Palak Mathur, Adv. Mrs. Priyanka Shrivastava, Adv.
For Respondent(s):
Mr. Rajat Nair, AAG Ms. Sugandha Jain, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Malik, Adv. Mr. Prabodh Kumar, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$
Ms. Yashika Varshney, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks adjournment on the ground that an application filed by the petitioners is pending and is likely to be decided in Signa the New Yerified first week of February, 2025 by the Court of Judicial Mugistrate First Class, Marwahi, Chhattisgarh.
Noting the above submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, the matter stands adjourned.
List the matter after four weeks.
(MANISH ISSRANI) (KAMLESH RAWAT) AR-CUM-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR