Uoi & Another vs. Bhatt Jagdish

è&

ITEM NO.9 Court No.6 SECTION XVII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CIVIL APPEAL D.NO(s). 28185 OF 2013 (For Prel. Hearing)

UOI & ANOTHER Appellant (s)

VERSUS

BHATT JAGDISH Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for leave to appeal u/s 31(1) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 and office report )

Date: 16/12/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.S. THAKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAMAJIT SEN

For Petitioner(s) Mr. L.N.Rao, ASG, Mr.R.Balasubramanium, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balaram Das,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Apart from the fact that there is a delay of 269 days in the filing of the application, we see no substantial question of law of general public importance arising for our consideration in this application. We, therefore, see no reason for grant of leave to appeal as prayed for. The question whether the delay in filing of O.A. was in the circumstances of the case properly explained is a matter on which we do not wish to pronounce authoritatively. All that we would say is that the view taken by the Tribunal shall remain confined to the facts and circumstances of the case at hand only.

|(Shashi Sareen) | |(Veena Khera) | |Court Master | |Court Master |

(Signed order is placed on the file)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL No. OF 2013 (28185)

|UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. |...| Appellant(s) |

| Versus |

|BHATT JAGDISH |...| Respondent(s) |

O R D E R

Apart from the fact that there is a delay of 269 days in the filing of the application, we see no substantial question of law of general public importance arising for our consideration in this application. We, therefore, see no reason for grant of leave to appeal as prayed for. The question whether the delay in filing of O.A. was in the circumstances of the case properly explained is a matter on which we do not wish to pronounce authoritatively. All that we would say is that the view taken by the Tribunal shall remain confined to the facts and circumstances of the case at hand only.

.......................J. (T.S.THAKUR)

.......................J. (VIKRAMAJIT SEN)

New Delhi, December 16, 2013

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL No. OF 2013 (28185)

|UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. |...| Appellant(s) |

| Versus |

|BHATT JAGDISH |...| Respondent(s) |

O R D E R

Apart from the fact that there is a delay of 269 days in the filing of the application, we see no substantial question of law of general public importance arising for our consideration in this application. We, therefore, see no reason for grant of leave to appeal as prayed for. The question whether the delay in filing of O.A. was in the circumstances of the case properly explained is a matter on which we do not wish to pronounce authoritatively. All that we would say is that the view taken by the Tribunal shall remain confined to the facts and circumstances of the case at hand only.

.......................J. (VIKRAMAJIT SEN)

New Delhi, December 16, 2013