The Directorate Of Enforcement vs. Hemal Arun Mehta

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Aniruddha Bose
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:18 Sept 2023
CNR:SCIN010281282023

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Before:

Hon'ble Aniruddha Bose, Hon'ble Bela M. Trivedi

Stage:

FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES

Remarks:

Dismissed as withdrawn

Listed On:

18 Sept 2023

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) Diary No(s). 28128/2023 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-04-2023 in WP No. 10901/2023 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Madras)

THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

HEMAL ARUN MEHTA Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.153204/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.153205/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT )

Date : 18-09-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

Signature Not Verified

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI

For Petitioner(s)Mr. S.V. Raju, A.S.G.
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR
Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Adv.
Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv.
Mr. Arkaj<br>Kumar, Adv.
Ms. Archna Pathak Dave, Adv.
For Respondent(s)Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Purti Gupta, AOR

Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Adv. Ms. Purti Gupta, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Shri S. V. Raju, learned ASG submits that the FIR on predicate offence has been quashed on 10.05.2023. In such

circumstances, the petition becomes infurctuous.

The special leave petition is dismissed as withdrawn as having become infurctuous.

Learned ASG also wants this Court to observe that in this event quashing order is subsequently overturned by a Digitally signed by Neetu Sachdeva Date: 2023.09.18 16:55:14 IST Reason:

contd..

superior forum, his client would have the right to revive the proceedings. We do not make any comment in that regard except Mr. Raju's client shall be entitled to take such steps in such situation as may be permissible under the law.

(NEETU SACHDEVA) (VIDYA NEGI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(2) - 18 Sept 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(1) - 15 Sept 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view