K. Venkatesh @ Chandru vs. The State Of Tamilnadu
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Ordinary
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
List After (Weeks) [4], List before court/bench
Listed On:
25 Oct 2019
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Order Text
REGISTRAR COURT. 1
SECTION II-C
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8929/2019
K. VENKATESH @ CHANDRU
Petitioner(s)
Respondent $(s)$
VERSUS
THE STATE OF TAMILNADU & ANR.
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. )
Date: 25-10-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Ashish Chaubey, Adv. Ms. Maffi, Adv. Ms. Chitrakala, Adv. Mr. Yusuf, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Service is complete on respondent No.1 but none has entered appearance.
Service is complete on respondent No.2. Ld. Advocate, Mr.Hardik Gautam, appearing on behalf of Mr.M.P. Parthiban, Advocate-on-record appears for respondent No.2. He seeks time to file vakalatnama. Be filed within two weeks.
Matter be processed in terms of Order XXII Rule 6, Supreme Court Rules 2013 read with Chapter XIV Clause 15(iii) of Practice and Procedure, Supreme Court 2017. Ld. Counsel for $NO.2$ seeks four weeks' time respondent for filina Solution/counter affidavit. Be filed in the meantime within $\frac{1}{14.56}$ four weeks.
ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order