Wasim Akram vs. R. Krishnaiah
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
1 Mar 2013
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Ô ITEM NO.90 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 S ECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Civil Appeal No(s). 8875-8883/2010 A.P.STATE BACKWARD CLASSES COMMN. Appe llant(s) VERSUS T.MURALIDHAR RAO & ORS. Resp ondent(s) Date : 18/09/2014 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. C. K. Sucharita,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr.D.Bharat Kumar,adv. Mr. Abhijit Sengupta,Adv. Mr. G. N. Reddy,Adv. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Sarad Kumar Singhania,Adv. Mrs. D. Bharathi Reddy,Adv. Mr.Uzmi Jameel Husain,adv. Mr. Shakil Ahmed Syed,Adv. Mr.Hitendra Nath Rath,adv. Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao,Adv. Ms.Praseena Elizabeth Joseph,adv. M/s. Lawyer S Knit & Co,Adv. Respondent-in-person,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The office report indicates that the appellant has already filed the statement of case but the respondents(except respondent No.1 in person)have not filed the same . The office report further states that by order dated 1.08.2014 of the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber, it has been directed that in view of the amendments incorporated in the Supreme Court Rules, it may not be necessary to file the statement of case. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2014.09.20 10:52:47 IST Reason: (M K HAN JURA) Regist rar SB