Joginder Singh vs. The Union Of India Through The Secretary Rehabilitation Department, Jam Nagar House, Central Government, New Delhi
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.14 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24739/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT NAWAN PIND Petitioner(s) VERSUS FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report ) SLP(C)No.25614/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE MR. SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS M.P. JHA MR. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA SLP(C)No.26787/2010 FAQIR CHAND & ORS. MR. RAJINDER MATHUR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MS. KAVEETA WADIA SLP(C)No.27490/2010 NARESH KUMAR MR. BALBIR SINGH GUPTA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. MR. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA SLP(C)No.26806/2010 HAR IQBAL SINGH & ORS. MR. RAJINDER MATHUR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP MS. KAVEETA WADIA SLP(C)No.26918/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VILL. MR. RAJINDER MATHUR KADIANA & ORS. MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MS. KAVEETA WADIA SLP(C)No.26920/2010 JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. MR. RAJINDER MATHUR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP MS. KAVEETA WADIA SLP(C)No.26921/2010 GRAM PANCHYAT OF VILL.KADIANA MR. RAJINDER MATHUR & ORS. MS. KAVEETA WADIA Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. MR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA SLP(C)No.35087/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT,HAMIDPUR THRU MR. RAJINDER MATHUR ITS SARPANC MR. P.N. GUPTA Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. SLP(C)No.11831/2011 JOGINDER SINGH & ORS. MR. SHREE PAL SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. MR. GAGAN GUPTA SLP(C)No.13653/2011 GRAM PANCHAYAT BASAUDI MR. SATYENDRA KUMAR Vs. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER MR. ABHAY KUMAR & ORS. MR. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA SLP(C)No.25383-25384/2011 MEWA SINGH MR. A.S. PUNDIR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
¶:
contd.......2
| SLP(C)No.30979/2011 | GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE UCHABET<br>Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. | MR. RAHUL GUPTA<br>MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP |
|---|---|---|
| SLP(C)No.34114/2011 GRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE | MR. RAMESHWAR PRASAD | |
| GOYAL | DHUNDIANWALA<br>Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS | MR. PRAVEEN SWARUP |
| SLP(C)No.4915/2012 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.<br>TAMNOWALI | MR. K.S. RANA<br>MR. ABHIJAT P. | |
| MEDH | Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. | MR. KAMAL MOHAN |
| GUPTA | MR. BHASKAR Y. | |
| KULKARNI | MR. ANIL KUMAR | |
| TANDALE | MR. BALBIR SINGH | |
| GUPTA,<br>SLP(C)No.6505/2012 GRAM PANCHAYAT<br>Vs. RAM SARUP & ORS. | MR. ANKUR MITTAL<br>MR. BALBIR SINGH | |
| GUPTA | ||
| GUPTA | SLP(C)No.6533/2012 GRAM PANCHAYAT<br>Vs. NITI SEN BHATIA AND ORS | MR. ANKUR MITTAL<br>MR. KAMAL MOHAN |
| SLP(C)No.4128-4129/2012 OM PRAKASH<br>MENDIRATTA | MS.JYOTI<br>Vs. STATE OF | |
| HARYANA & ORS. | MR. KAMAL MOHAN GUPTA | |
| SLP(C)No.8111/2013 G.T.B.SAHIB CHARITABLE<br>HOSPITAL SOCITY<br>Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. | MR. S.K. SABHARWAL<br>MR. ABHAY KUMAR | |
| Date: 18/10/2013 | This Petition was called on for hearing today. | |
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv. | |
| Mr.Akshat Goel,adv.<br>Mr.Shree Pal Singh,adv. | ||
| Mr.Avneesh Garg,adv.<br>Mr.R.P.Goel,adv. | ||
| Mr.Abdul Wadud,adv.<br>Mr.Subramonium Prasad,adv. | ||
| Mr.Jasbir Singh Malik,adv.<br>Mr.S.K.Sabharwal,adv. | ||
| For Respondent(s) | Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. | |
| Mr.Gagan Gupta,adv. | ||
| Mr.B.Y.Kulkarni,adv.<br>Mr.Vishal Mahajan,adv. |
Contd.......3
Mr.M.P.Jha,adv. Mr.Ram Ekbal Roy,adv.
Mr.Himanshu Gupta,adv.
Ms.Nupur Choudhary,adv. Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr.Kamal Mohan Gupta,adv.
Mr.R.K.Pandey,adv. Mr.Jagjit Singh Chhabra,adv.
Mr.Naveen Kr.Chauhan,adv. Mr.Praveen Swarup,adv.
Mr.Shridhar Y.Chitale,adv. Mr.Abhijat P.Medh,adv.
Mr.P.N.Gupta,adv. Mrs.Bharti Gupta,adv.
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
In SLP(C) No.4915/12 respondent No.13 clarifies that by last order it was recorded that his client adopts the counter affidavit filed by respondent No.14, which is not correct. According to him respondent No.13 has filed the counter affidavit which is being adopted by respondent No.14 and not vice versa. This is recorded.
In SLP(C) No.25614/10, 26787/10 and 4915/12 the substitution applications are defective. The respective petitioners are directed to cure the defects in the substitution application.
In SLP(C) No.26787/10 the 14th petitioner is reported to be dead. Ld.counsel for the petitioner seeks time to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased petitioner.
In SLP(C) No.26921/10 it is reported that respondent No.6 has died and the petitioner proposes to take steps to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased respondent No.6.
ITEM NO.14 -4-
Contd.....4
In all other matters, await return of notice of the unserved respondents. The respective petitioners are directed to take steps to issue fresh notice to the unserved respondents. List the matter on 6.12.2013.
| (Sunil Thomas) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Registrar |
SB