Joginder Singh vs. The Union Of India Through The Secretary Rehabilitation Department, Jam Nagar House, Central Government, New Delhi

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SUNIL THOMAS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).24224/2010 GRAM PANCHAYAT OF VIL.KUM-KALAN Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief and office report ) WITH SLP(C) NO. 1059 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 11213 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 11510 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 11831 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 13653 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 24739 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 25383-25384 of 2011 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 25614 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 26787 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 26806 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 26918 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 26920 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 26921 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 27490 of 2010 (With office report) SLP(C) NO. 29291 of 2010 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 30979 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) contd....2 ITEM NO.31 -2- SLP(C) NO. 34114 of 2011 (With prayer for interim relief and office report) SLP(C) NO. 35087 of 2010 (With office report) Date: 15/02/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Bharat Bhushan,adv. Mr.S.K.Gupta,adv. Mr.Shishpal Laler,adv. Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv.

æ8ITEM NO.31 REGISTRAR COURT.2 SECTION IVB

Mr. A.S. Pundir Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta Mr. Rajinder Mathur Mr.Akshat Goel,adv. Mr. Shree Pal Singh Mrs. Sureshta Bagga Mr. Subramonium Prasad Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta Dr. Kailash Chand Mr. Satyendra Kumar Mr. Aftab Ali Khan Mr. Vineet Bhagat Mr. Rahul Gupta For Respondent(s) Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Mr. M.P. Jha,adv. Mr.Alok Mahajan,adv. Mr. P.N. Gupta,adv. Mr.N.K.Chauhan,adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup Mr.Manjit Singh,adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta Mr.Kunal Juneja,adv. Dr. (Mrs.) Vipin Gupta contd....3 ITEM NO.31 -3- Dr. Kailash Chand,adv. Mr.R.K.Pandey,adv. Ms. Kavita Wadia Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta Mr. Abhay Kumar,adv. Mr.Gagan Gupta,adv. Mr.Saurabh Gupta,adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R In SLP(C) No.11831/11 respondent no.4 seeks time for filing vakalatnama and counter affidavit. Ld.counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the direction of this Court, the petitioner had remitted the process fee and spare copy prior to 9.01.2012 which could not be brought to the notice of the Court on 9.01.2012. On the above basis, Ld.counsel submits that the order imposing cost was not justified. Office is directed to verify whether the petitioner had remitted the process fee and spare copy as submitted. In SLP(C) No.24224/10 Ld.counsel for the

petitioner has filed an affidavit stating that when he went to serve dasti notice issued by the Supreme Court through the Court of Senior Sub Judge, Ludhiana he was informed by the Nazir that the photostat copies of the summons cannot be accepted and required him to furnish the summons in original with the seal and signature. The photocopies of the summons issued from the Court has been filed along with. Office to verify whether original summons have been issued to the petitioner and if not how it happened.

ITEM NO.31 -4-

Contd....4

In SLP(C) No. 11510/11 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has not remitted the process fee and spare copy in spite of last chance granted. However, I am inclined to grant three more weeks time subject to the condition that he files the process fee/spare copy and deposits a sum of Rs. 500/- in the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee as cost within three weeks. If the above conditions are not satisfied, list the matter before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for nonprosecution. If steps are taken, issue notice. Await return of notice. In SLP(C) No.1059/11 Ld.counsel for the petitioner has not taken steps to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased respondents. Petitioner is granted four weeks time for taking necessary steps. The petitioner has also not remitted the process fee and spare copy for issuing notice to respondent Nos. 1 & 13. Petitioner is granted three more weeks time as a last chance for remitting the process fee and spare copy. In SLP(C) No.26806/10 it is reported that respondent No.6 is dead. Petitioner is directed to verify and take steps if any required. In SLP(C) No.25614/10 notice addressed to respondent Nos. 4,10 and 18 have been returned unserved. Ld.counsel for the petitioner is granted four weeks time for taking fresh steps against the unserved respondents.

In SLP(C) No.26787/10 it is reported that respondent No.14 has expired. Petitioner to take steps if any within four weeks.

ITEM NO.31 -5-

contd....5

In all other remaining cases, the served respondents are granted four weeks time for filing counter affidavit. Await return of notice of the unserved respondents. List the matter on 30.03.2012.

(Sunil Thomas) Registrar