REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVB

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24739/2010

GRAM PANCHAYAT NAWAN PIND Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER & ORS. Respondent(s)

(with interim relief and office report)

WITH SLP(C) No. 25614/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 26787/2010 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 26806/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 26920/2010

(With appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for setting aside an abatement and appln. (s) for exemption from filing O.T. and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and appln.(s) for substitution and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing substitution appln. and Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 27490/2010 (With Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 29291/2010 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 1059/2011 (With Office Report) SLP(C) No. 11213/2011 (With Office Report) Digitally signed by Madhu Grover Date: 2015.05.02 08:20:56 CEST Reason: Signature Not Verified

SLP(C) No. 30979/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 34114/2011 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 4128-4129/2012 (With Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 4915/2012 (With appln.(s) for impleadment and appln.(s) for impleadment and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 6505/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 6533/2012 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 8111/2013 (With Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C) No. 36770/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report)

Date : 01/05/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

	For Petitioner(s)	Mr. Rahul Dagar,Adv.
		Mr. Vineet Bhagat,Adv.
		Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv.
		Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv.
		Mr. Balbir Singh Gupta,Adv.
		Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv.
		Dr. (Mrs. ) Vipin Gupta,Adv.
		Mr. Rahul Gupta,Adv.
		Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv.
		Mr. K. S. Rana,Adv.
		Mr. Ankur Mittal,Adv.
		Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik,Adv.
		Mr. S. K. Sabharwal,Adv.

For Respondent(s) Dr. Kailash Chand,Adv. Mr. Ram Ekbal Roy,Adv. Mr. M. P. Jha,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Wadia,Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup,Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh,Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Abhay Kumar,Adv. Mr. Rajinder Mathur,Adv. Ms. Kaveeta Waida,Adv. Mr. Yashpal Dhingra,Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar,Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma,Adv. Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv. Ms. S. Janani,Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Y. Kulkarni,Adv. Mr. R.K. Verma,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj,Adv. Ms. Kiran Ahlawat,Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta,Adv. Ms. Nupur Choudhary,Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) No. 24739/2010

The office report indicates that the respondent No.4 has expired. The learned counsel for the petitioners shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the said deceased respondent.

SLP(C) No. 25614 and 26806/2010

What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is that the Ld.Counsel for the petitioners has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No.8 which is defective. The Ld. Counsel shall within a period of four weeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the said affidavit.

SLP(C) No. 26787/2010

The office report states that the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent Nos. 14 and 27. The said application shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.

The learned counsel for the petitioners shall within a period of four weeks comply with the terms of the office report.

SLP(C) No. 27490/2010

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 3 and 4 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above.

SLP(C) No. 26920/2010

What gets revealed from the perusal of the file is that the Ld.Counsel for the petitioners has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No.13 which is defective. The Ld. Counsel shall within a period of four weeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the said affidavit.

The office report proceeds to state that the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No. 27. The said application shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.

SLP(C) No. 29291/2010

The office report states that the learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No.6. The said application shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter.

SLP(C) No. 1059/2011

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 1 and 13 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above.

The office report indicates that the Respondent Nos. 4,5,8,9,10 and 12 have expired. The learned counsel for the petitioners shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the each deceased respondents.

SLP(C) No. 11213/2011

The office report indicates that the respondents have failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court on its own turn, if and when the connected ones get ready for listing.

SLP(C) No. 30979/2011

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 1,2,6 and 7 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above.

SLP(C) No. 34114/2011

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 1 and 2 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above.

SLP(C) No. 4915/2012

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 7,8,10,12,13 and 19-22 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above.

The office report indicates that the Ld.Counsel for the petitioners has filed an application for substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of the deceased respondent No.9 which is defective. The Ld. Counsel shall within a period of four weeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the said affidavit.

SLP(C) No. 6505/2012

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 2 to 4 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above.

SLP(C) Nos. 6533 /2012

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent No. 5 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above.

SLP(C) Nos. 4128-4129/2012

Ms. Kiran Ahlawat, Ld. Advocate has appeared on behalf of the respondent State and its functionaries. She seeks and is given four weeks time to file the vakalatnama and the counter affidavit.

SLP(C) No. 8111/2013

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent No. 3,5 and 6 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above.

SLP(C) No. 36770/2014

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent Nos. 4,6 and 7 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of three weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the concerned District Court the particulars of which shall be furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioners within the period prescribed above.

List again on 20.8.2015.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar

MG