Central Bureau Of Investigation vs. D K Shivakumar

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 9097/2023

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-06-2023 in WA No. 646/2023 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru)

VERSUS

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

D K SHIVAKUMAR & ORS.

Date: 10-11-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

$CORAM$ :

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General(N.P.) Mr. Suryaprakash V Raju, A.S.G. Mr. M.K. Maroria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Kanu Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. Mr. Diqvijay Dam, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatqi, Sr. Adv. (N.P.) Mr. Vipin Sanghi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mayank Jain, Adv. Mr. Parmatma Singh, AOR Mr. Madhur Jain, Adv. Mr. Devdutt Kamat, Sr. Adv. Mr. D. L. Chidananda, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The impugned order being interim in nature, we are not ure Not Verified to interfere with the same, more, particularly when the petitioner - CBI has already filed an application for vacation of

COURT NO.17

ITEM NO.34

Petitioner(s)

Respondent(s)

the stay granted in the impugned order passed by the High Court, before the High Court.

However, it is requested that the High Court may hear and dispose of the application filed by the CBI seeking vacation of stay and the appeal pending before it as expeditiously as possible and preferably within two weeks.

The special leave petition stands disposed of accordingly.

All pending applications are disposed of.

(NEETA SAPRA) (MAMTA RAWAT)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)