Arcelormittal India Pvt. Ltd vs. Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Sudhanshu Dhulia
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
IA Allowed [146402/2023], List On (Date) [30-10-2023], Notice Returnable [D:0,W:0,M:0]
Listed On:
10 Jun 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.10
COURT NO.2
SECTION X
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
<pre>Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 776/2023</pre>ARCELORMITTAL INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD & ORS.Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.146401/2023-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.146402/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. )
Date: 06-10-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA
| Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv.<br>For Petitioner(s)<br>Mr. Dama Sheshadri Naidu, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv.<br>Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv.<br>Mr. Ashim Sood, Adv.<br>Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Adv.<br>Mr. Anshuman Srivastava, Adv.<br>Mr. Madhav Misra, Adv.<br>Mr. Victor Das, Adv.<br>Mr. Himanshu Saraswat, Adv.<br>Mr. E.C. Agrawala, AOR |
|---|
| For Respondent(s)<br>Ms. Kiran Suri, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Nishanth Patil, AOR<br>Mr. Ayush P Shah, Adv.<br>Mr. Vignesh Adithiya S, Adv.<br>Mr. Amit J., Adv. |
| Mr. Anand Sanjay M Nuli, Adv.<br>Mr. Suraj Kaushik, Adv.<br>For M/S. Nuli & Nuli, AOR<br>Mr. K. Parameshwar, Adv. |
Mr. Mithun Shashank, Adv. Mr. Kailas Bajirao Autade, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Application for exemption from filing O.T. is allowed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that in view of the changed scenario the petitioner is not desirous of keeping the land and will return the entire land of 2643 acres. The amount paid of Rs. 267 crores can also be forfeited by the Development Board.
Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 seeks time to obtain instructions.
Issue notice.
In view of the aforesaid changed situation, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 accepts notice in the aforesaid context.
We may note the concern of the learned counsel representing the farmers that they have to receive compensation and whether the petitioner or any third party with whom the Board has to deal with.
List on 30.10.2023.
[CHARANJEET KAUR] [POONAM VAID] ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
2