Union Of India Secretary Ministry Of Environment And Forest vs. Ajay Marathe
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
4 Sept 2017
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
O U T T O D A Y
ITEM NO.113 COURT NO.1 SECTION IX
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.23091-23092/2017
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-09-2017 in WP No. 9508/2017 01-09-2017 in PIL No.24110/2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay)
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
AJAY MARATHE & ANR. Respondent(s)
(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and permission to file lengthy list of dates)
Date : 04-09-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG |
|---|---|
| Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. | |
| Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR | |
| Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Adv. | |
| Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv. | |
| Mr. Saurabh Shamshery, Adv. | |
| Ms. Kasturi Sharma, Adv. | |
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Adv. |
| Dr. Ramesh B. Deshpande, Adv. | |
| Mr. Ambhay Anil Anturkar, Adv. | |
| Mr. Abhikalp Pratap Singh, Adv. | |
| for Abhay Anturkar and Associates | |
| Mr. C.U. Singh, Sr. Adv. | |
| Mr. Sahil Monga, Adv. | |
| Mr. Anupam Prakash, Adv. | |
| Mrs. Manik Karanjawala, Adv. | |
Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Issue notice.
As Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, learned counsel has entered appearance on behalf of Mr. Ajay Marathe, the respondent No.1, no further notice need be issued to him. Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, learned counsel has entered appearance on behalf of the State of Maharashtra.
Mr. C.U. Singh, learned senior counsel being assisted by Mr. Sahil Monga, learned counsel has entered appearance on behalf of the intervenor who was heard in the High Court. Hence, no further notice need be issued.As far as the other respondents are concerned, issue notice fixing a returnable date within two weeks. Dasti, in addition, is permitted.
As an interim measure, it is directed that there shall be stay of the operation of the order dated 1 st September, 2017, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Public Interest Litigation (Stamp) No.24110 of 2017 and Writ Petition No.9508 of 2017. As we have stayed the operation of the impugned order, we are absolutely certain that the High Court shall not pass any further interim order in this regard.
Let the matter be listed on 22nd September, 2017.
(Chetan Kumar) (Shakti Prakash Sharma) Court Master Assistant Registrar