Gokal Chand vs. State Of Haryana

ITEM NO.100

REGISTRAR COURT. 2

SECTION IV

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA

Civil Appeal No(s). 1951-1952/2012

ASHA RANI ETC

Appellant(s)

VERSUS

L.A.C AND ANR

Respondent(s)

Date: 02/09/2014 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

For Appellant(s)

Mr. S. K. Sabharwal, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

What gets revealed from the perusal of the office report is that the original record has been received from the High Court and is available in this registry for reference of the Hon'ble Court. The office report further is that the Learned counsel for the parties have not filed the statement of case despite notice dated 06.09.2012. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 provides that if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special leave to appear (SLP)/appeal, as statement of case, and does not desire to file any further statement of case. The order further provides that if the pondent has entered appearance and does not file a statement of 10.55.3615<br>Rease Case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same.

$\dots\ldots\ldots\ldots\ldots\ldots2$

In view of the rule position cited above no further opportunity for filing the statement of case is warranted to be given to the parties. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court under the rules.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar

SB