Rahul. S vs. State Of Kerala
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble A.S. Bopanna, Hon'ble Hima Kohli
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Disposed off
Listed On:
5 Jan 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
$\mathbf{1}$
ITEM NO.37
COURT NO.12
SECTION X
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). $461/2022$
RAHUL. S
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
WITH
W.P.(Crl.) No. 78/2023 (X)
Date: 01-05-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Adv. M/S. Subash Chandran & Kavitha Law Associates, AOR Mr. Subash Chandran, Adv. Mr. Sayooj Mohandas M, Adv. Mrs. Kavitha Kt, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Harshad V. Hameed, AOR Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv. Mr. Subhash Chandran K.r., Adv. Mrs. Ashly Harshad, Adv. Mr. Praveen Bhatia, Adv.
<pre>Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s). 461/2022</pre>UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER
Learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that the Advisory Committee has already considered and passed the order. If that be the position, the instant petition would not survive for atur<mark>e No</mark>t Ve sideration. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to $0:04:42$ assail the Order passed by the Advisory Committee, if the petitioner is advised to do so.
The petition is accordingly, disposed of along with pending application(s), if any.
W.P.(Crl.) No. 78/2023
Learned counsel for the respondent-State seeks time to secure instructions in the matter and file counter statement.
Hence, list the matter after three weeks.
(NISHA KHULBEY) (DIPTI KHURANA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR