Rajmudra Real Estate Pvt. Ltd vs. The Residential Deputy Collector
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
26 Nov 2021
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 19056/2021
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-10-2021 in WP No. 6764/2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at <pre>Bombay at Aurangabad)</pre>
M/S RAJMUDRA REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE RESIDENTIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.149168/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.149170/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. )
Date: 26-11-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Mr. Paramjit Singh Patwalia, Sr. Adv. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sandeep Sudhakar Deshmukh, AOR Ms. Harshika Verma, Adv.
For Respondent( $s$ )
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that proceedings under Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955 (for short, 'the Act, 1955') were initiated by 4<sup>th</sup> respondent -General Secretary of the Union.
The petitioner purchased the property in question in a court auction conducted by the competent authority under the Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 Affility the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and 10.34 EFF Forcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.<br>Read EFF Forcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
There was a categorical order passed by this Court that respondent No.4 shall not be permitted to raise any dispute about the proceedings initiated by the petitioner. Still further, the authority under the Act, 1955 can exercise jurisdiction only if the property in question is admittedly a government property. Since there is a dispute that it is not a government property, the summary jurisdiction under the Act could not be invoked.
Issue notice.
In the meantime, there shall be stay of further proceedings in Regular Civil Appeal No.97 of 2009, pending before the District Judge, Jalgaon, Maharashtra.
(SWETA BALODI) (RENU BALA GAMBHIR) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)