Noida vs. Khazan
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
29 Sept 2010
Order Text
*ITEM NO.13 COURT NO.13 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A.Nos. 3 & 4 In Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).19750/2010 (From the judgement and order dated 17/11/2009 in FA No.346/2002 of The HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD) NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEV. AUTHORITY Petitioner(s) VERSUS MANGE RAM & ANR. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for substitution of deceased respondent and c/delay in filing substitution appln., office report) Date: 23/04/2012 These applications were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK (IN CHAMBERS) For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.(NP) For Respondent(s) Mr. S.K. Gupta,Adv. For Mr. Shekhar Kumar,Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R I.A.Nos. 3 & 4 of 2011 These are applications for substituting the legal representatives of deceased respondent no.1 and 1/1 along with the application for condonation of delay. The applications are allowed. The cause title of the Special Leave Petition be amended accordingly. (KUSUM SYAL) (MADHU SAXENA) SR.P.A ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order