Through Its Secretary Muslims Gujar Tribals Welfare Society (Rgd) vs. The State Of Uttarakhand Through Secretary Department Of Forest

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Arun Mishra
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:13 Oct 2017
CNR:SCIN010275352017

AI Summary

The Supreme Court has allowed the Muslims Gujar Tribals (Rgd.) Welfare Society to withdraw their writ petition, granting them the crucial liberty to pursue their case by approaching the High Court. This procedural order redirects the legal battle to a more appropriate forum, ensuring the welfare society can continue its fight for tribal rights.

Ratio Decidendi:
The Supreme Court may grant leave to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to approach the High Court when such a request is made by the petitioner's counsel, effectively allowing the petitioner to rectify their choice of forum without prejudicing their substantive claims.

Case Identifiers

Primary Case No:939/2017
Case Type:Writ Petition(s)(Civil)
Case Sub-Type:Writ Petition - Tribal Welfare/Forest Rights
Secondary Case Numbers:27535/2017, SCIN010275352017
Order Date:2017-10-13
Filing Year:2017
Court:Supreme Court of India
Bench:Division Bench
Judges:Hon'ble Arun Mishra, Hon'ble Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

Petitioner's Counsel

Shakeel Ahmed
Advocate on Record - Appeared

Advocates on Record

Shakeel Ahmed

eCourtsIndia AITM

Brief Facts Summary

The Muslims Gujar Tribals (Rgd.) Welfare Society filed a Writ Petition (Civil) No. 939/2017 before the Supreme Court against the State of Uttarakhand and other respondents. On October 13, 2017, during the hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought and was granted leave to withdraw the writ petition with the specific liberty to approach the High Court for the subject matter. Consequently, the Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.

Timeline of Events

2017-08-31

Writ Petition No. 27535/2017 filed in Supreme Court.

2017-10-04

Writ Petition No. 939/2017 registered, and I.A. for exemption from filing O.T. filed.

2017-10-13

Petition called on for hearing before a Division Bench of the Supreme Court.

2017-10-13

Petitioner's counsel sought leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the High Court.

2017-10-13

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, granting the requested liberty.

Key Factual Findings

The petitioner's counsel sought leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.

Source: Current Court Finding

The petitioner's counsel sought liberty to approach the High Court.

Source: Current Court Finding

Primary Legal Issues

1.Jurisdictional propriety of a Writ Petition in Supreme Court versus High Court
2.Procedural aspect of withdrawing a writ petition with liberty to approach a lower court

Petitioner's Arguments

The counsel for the petitioner specifically requested the court's permission to withdraw the writ petition. This request was accompanied by a prayer for liberty to approach the High Court for the same subject matter, indicating a strategic decision to pursue remedies in an alternative forum.

Respondent's Arguments

No explicit arguments from the respondent's side are recorded in the order, as the matter was disposed of on a procedural request for withdrawal by the petitioner.

Court's Reasoning

The Court acceded to the petitioner's request for withdrawal with liberty, implicitly acknowledging the petitioner's right to choose the appropriate forum for adjudication and the procedural allowance for such withdrawals when no substantive prejudice is caused.

Judicial Philosophy Indicators:
  • Emphasis on Procedural Fairness
  • Adherence to Jurisdictional Norms
Order Nature:Procedural
Disposition Status:Disposed
Disposition Outcome:Withdrawn

Specific Directions

  1. 1.Leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the High Court is granted.

Precedential Assessment

Non-Binding (Procedural)

This is a routine procedural order allowing the withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to approach a lower court; it does not establish any new legal principle or interpret substantive law.

Tips for Legal Practice

1.Counsel should carefully assess the appropriate jurisdictional forum (High Court vs. Supreme Court) for a writ petition at the outset to potentially avoid procedural withdrawals.
2.When withdrawing a petition from a higher court, always explicitly seek and ensure the court grants 'liberty to approach' the appropriate lower forum to preserve the client's rights.
3.Procedural withdrawals with liberty are common and generally granted by the Supreme Court when no substantive adjudication has commenced, allowing litigants to correct forum choices.

Legal Tags

Supreme Court writ petition withdrawal with libertyTransfer of jurisdiction from Supreme Court to High CourtProcedural order for writ petition dismissal as withdrawnLegal remedies available after Supreme Court withdrawalAdvocate on Record seeking leave in Supreme Court

Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

FRESH

Before:

Hon'ble Arun Mishra, Hon'ble Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

Stage:

FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

Dismissed as withdrawn

Listed On:

13 Oct 2017

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s).939/2017

MUSLIMS GUJAR TRIBALS (RGD.)WELFARE SOCIETY Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.99863/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

Date : 13-10-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

For Petitioner(s)

Mr.Shakeel Ahmed, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach to the High Court.

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

(Ashok Raj Singh) (Tapan Kumar Chakraborty) Court Master Court Master