State Of Gujarat vs. Indian Rayon
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
2 Jul 2012
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Listed on Court No. Item No.
SECTION IIIA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4908 OF 2012 WITH PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL NOS. 38606, 38607, 38608 & 38609 OF 2012
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ...APPELLANTS
VERSUS
INDIAN RAYON & ANR. ...RESPONDENTS
OFFICE REPORT
The matters above mentioned were listed before the Ld. Registar's Court on 9 th September, 2015, when the following Order was passed:
"Civil Appeal No.4908/2012
Ld.counsel for the appellant shall file the affidavit of valuation within a period of four weeks.
SLP(C) No.38606/2012
The sole respondent has not filed the counter affidavit in spite of last chance granted. Viewed thus, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per rules.
SLP(C) No.38607/2012
The office report is that the Ld.counsel for the respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavait.
Ms.Diksha Rai, Ld.counsel shall file the NOC from the erstwhile counsel Mr.Siddhartha Choudhary within a period of two weeks time as last chance.
SLP(C) No.38608/2012
Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent No.2 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks.
SLP(C) No.38609/2012
Ld.counsel for the respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavait but he has failed to file the vakalatnama. Ld.counsel shall within a period of four weeks file the vakalatnama failing which the counter affidavait filed by him shall be taken off the record.
Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the unserved respondent No.2 shall be taken by the Ld.counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks.
List the matter again on 27.11.2015."
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4908 OF 2012
There are two Respondents and are represented through Counsel.
Service is complete.
It is further submitted that Counsel for the Appellant has not filed the Affidavit of valuation till date.
SLP(C) NO. 38606 OF 2012
There is sole Respondent and is represented through Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Advocate but Counter Affidavit has not been filed so far.
Service of notice is complete.
SLP(C) NO. 38607 OF 2012
It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has neither take fresh steps to serve the unserved Respondent No. 2 nor filed spare copy to issue notice to Respondent No. 2.
It is further submitted that Ms. Diksha Rai, Counsel for the petitioner has not filed NOC from erstwhile Counsel Mr. Siddhartha Choudhary so far.
SLP(C) NO. 38608 OF 2012
It is submitted that Counsel for the petitioner has not taken any fresh steps to serve the unserved Respondent No. 2 so far.
It is further submitted that Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Counsel for the Respondent 1 has not filed Counter Affidavit so far.
SLP(C) NO. 38609 OF 2012
It is submitted that Mr. Kunal Verma, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent 1 and he has already filed Counter Affidavit.
It is further submitted that counsel for petitioner has not taken any steps to serve the unserved Respondent2 so far.
The matters above mentioned are listed before the Ld. Registar's Court for orders.
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
COPY TO:
Mrs. Hemantika Wahi, Advocate
- Ms. Sumita Hazarika, Advocate
- Mr. Ejaz Maqbool, Advocate
- Mr. Siddharth Chowdhary, Advocate
- Ms. Diksha Rai, Advocate
- Mr. Kunal Verma, Advocate