M. Sathemma (D) By Lrs vs. Farhat Sultana

.

ITEM NO.45 REGISTRAR COURT.1 SECTION XIIA

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR S.G. SHAH

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25263/2012

S.SATHEMMA & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

FARHAT SULTANA & ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief)

Date: 27/09/2012 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. John Mathew,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Petitioner has failed to take steps, as per rules. There is interim order in their favour. Practically for the default of the petitioner and in absence of any application, the matter is required to be listed for nonprosecution.

Registry has to clarify in writing that why the matter has been listed before this Court for no valid reason. Whenever any litigant fails to take steps, as per law within the prescribed time and whenever the matters are ripe for non-prosecution for any proper reason, there is no reason to list such matter before the Registrar's Court to permit the

Item No.45 -2-

litigant to complete the lacuna in the matter. Such matter shall be directed to be listed before the Hon'ble udge in Chambers for nonprosecution.

List before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for non-prosecution in view of the non-action by the petitioner as per rules to see that how notice can be served by the other side at the earliest, more particularly when there is an interim order in their favour and when the court has allowed dasti notice on 7.9.2012.

rd