Priyanka Thard vs. Nikhil Thard

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1143 OF 2012

PRIYANKA THARD Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

NIKHIL THARD Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties through the process of mediation, he has instructions not to press the Transfer Petition. 2. Transfer Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.

............................J. ( R.M. LODHA )

NEW DELHI; ..............................J. AUGUST 5, 2013 ( MADAN B. LOKUR ) ITEM NO.54 COURT NO.3 SECTION XVIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL.) NO(s). 1143 OF 2012 PRIYANKA THARD Petitioner(s) VERSUS NIKHIL THARD Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for stay and placing on record memorandum of agreement and office report )) Date: 05/08/2013 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR

For Petitioner(s) Mr. P.I. Jose,Adv. Mr. Akshat Hansaria, Adv. Mr. Avnish Pandey, Adv. Mr. Abhinav Hansaria, Adv. Mr. Vinod Kumar K., Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Darpan K.M., Adv. Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi,Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Transfer Petition is dismissed as not pressed in terms of the signed order. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of.

|(Rajesh Dham) | |(Renu Diwan) | |Court Master | |Court Master |

(signed order is placed on the file)