Laximibai Narayan Prabu (Deceased) Through Her Lrs vs. Medha Nagesh Prabhu

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. S.P.S. LALER VERSUS MEDHA NAGESH PRABHU & ORS. Date: 04-05-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Mukti Chowdhary, AOR Mr. E. Vinay Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Anshula Vijav Kumar Grover, AOR Mr. Sangram Singh R. Bhonsle, Adv. Ms. Samridhi S. Jain, Adv. Mr. Nrupal A. Dingankar, Adv. Mr. Pushkara A. Bhonsle, Adv. Mr. Satyam Tripathi, Adv.

Mr. Navin Prakash, AOR Mr. Saket Singh, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel through Video Conference, the <pre>Court made the following</pre> 0 R D F R

Four weeks time, is granted to respondent no. 12 to file counter affidavit.

Learned counsel for respondent no. 12 and learned counsel for petitioner submits that efforts are being made to arrive at settlement between the parties.

Vakalatnama has been filed in respect of respondent nos. 16 We Not Verifie Same is defective. Four weeks time, as a last chance, is 9:18 IST granted to learned counsel for petitioner to cure the defects as well as to file counter affidavit.

REGISTRAR COURT. 2 ITEM NO.23

SECTION IX

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 3116/2021

LAXIMIBAI NARAYAN PRABU (DECEASED) THROUGH HER LRS Petitioner(s)

Respondent(s)

Respondent no. 2 is stated to be expired. Four weeks time, is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner, to move an application for substitution in this regard.

Notice could not be served upon respondent nos. 20 to 26 with various remarks. Two weeks time, is granted to learned counsel for petitioner, to take fresh steps and file fresh particulars, to serve upon above said respondents, as process could not be served. As prayed, dasti, in addition is permitted.

Despite due service, none appears on behalf of other respondent.

List again on 02.08.2022.

S.P.S. LALER Registrar