The State Of Kerala Represented By Secretary Irrigation Department vs. Chinnamma Yoyaki
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A.NO.2 OF 2015 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9217/2014
STATE OF KERALA & ANR. APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
CHINNAMMA YOYAKI & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
By order dated 14.10.2015, learned Chamber Judge had granted two weeks' time to the counsel for the appellants to comply with the office report.
It was further directed that the matter shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court in case of any default in compliance with the order. The counsel for the appellants points out that the compliance has been effected, though delayed by two days.
In the circumstances, the delay in compliance is condoned.
The dismissal order for non-prosecution is recalled and the matter is restored to its file.
Digitally signed by ASHIMA CHHABRA Date: 2016.02.03 15:47:21 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified ….................J. UDAY UMESH LALIT
NEW DELHI; FEBRUARY 01, 2016 ITEM NO.6 COURT NO.13 SECTION XIA
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
I.A. 2/2015 in Civil Appeal No(s). 9217/2014
STATE OF KERALA & ANR. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
CHINNAMMA YOYAKI & ORS. Respondent(s)
(For restoration and office report)
Date : 01/02/2016 This application was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT [IN CHAMBERS]
| For Appellant(s) | Mr. Jogy Scaria,Adv. |
|---|---|
| Ms. Beena Victor,Adv. | |
| Mr. Robin Jacob,Adv. | |
| Mr. Reegan S.Bel,Adv. |
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
By order dated 14.10.2015, learned Chamber Judge had granted two weeks' time to the counsel for the appellants to comply with the office report.
It was further directed that the matter shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court in case of any default in compliance with the order. The counsel for the appellants points out that the compliance has been effected, though delayed by two days.
In the circumstances, the delay in compliance is condoned.
The dismissal order for non-prosecution is recalled and the matter is restored to its file.
(ASHIMA CHHABRA) SR. P.A.
(RAJINDER KAUR) COURT MASTER