Mamta Dhasmana vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Human Resource Development Thru Its Sectretary

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Registrar (J) - Ii
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:18 Feb 2020
CNR:SCIN010270052017

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Fixed Date by Court

Before:

Hon'ble Arun Mishra, Hon'ble Indira Banerjee

Stage:

AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES

Remarks:

Disposed off

Listed On:

18 Feb 2020

In:

Judge

Category:

UNKNOWN

Interlocutory Applications:

84073/2017,192997/2019,

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.12

COURT NO.3

SECTION XIV

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 22907/2017

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-08-2017 in WP No. 9503/2016 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)

MAMTA DHASMANA & ORS.

Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Respondent $(s)$

PERMISSION $\mathbf{T}\mathbf{0}$ FILE 84073/2017 ADDITIONAL $(IA)$ No. DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) (IA No. 192997/2019 - STAY APPLICATION)

Date: 18-02-2020 This matter was called on for hearing today.

  • HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
  • For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ambar Qamaruddin, AOR Mr. Tejasvi Kumar, Adv. Ms. Surbhi Guleria, Adv.
  • For Respondent(s) Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG Ms. Seema Bengani, Adv. Mr. Ran Vijav Singh, Adv. Mr. Vikas Bansal, Adv. Ms. Saudamini Sharma, Adv. Ms. Akshita Goyal, Adv. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, AOR

Mr. Tanveer Zaki, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following 0 R D F R

It is agreed to by the parties that the petitioners shall file epresentation for regularisation as they are serving with effect $\overline{\mathbf{P}}$ om 2005 and they have rendered their services for approximately Let the representation be filed within a period of one 14 years. month from today. Let the representation be considered and decided by the respondents sympathetically and by a reasoned order within a period of four months from the date it is filed.

The observations made by the High Court shall not come in the way of the petitioners in filing and consideration of representation.

The petitioners' case can also be considered for continuation of services vis-a-vis to the posts which have been notified.

In view of the above, the Special Leave Petition is disposed of.

Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is/are disposed of.

(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (JAGDISH CHANDER) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(10) - 18 Feb 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(9) - 30 Jan 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 15 Jul 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 15 Apr 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 19 Jul 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 3 Apr 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 7 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 8 Dec 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 27 Oct 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 11 Sept 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view