Nathi Singh(D) Tr. Lrs vs. Dev Singh

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Registrar
Case Status:Pending
Order Date:9 May 2016
CNR:SCIN010267252012

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

Item No.7

$\mathbf{1}$

REGISTRAR COURT. 2

SECTION TVB

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 21650/2012 MADHURI VERMA & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

DEV SINGH & ORS. <pre>(with interim relief and office report)</pre> Respondent(s)

WITH SLP(C) No. $26419/2012$ <pre>Interim Relief and Office Report)</pre>

SLP(C) No. 30587/2012 Office Report)

Date : 09/05/2016 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) Ms. Reeta Dewan Puri, Adv. Mr. P. N. Puri, Adv.

Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv. Mr. Abhijat P. Medh, Adv.

Mr. Zakir Hussain, Adv.

<pre>For Respondent(s)</pre> Ms. Mukti Chowdhary, Adv. Ms. Nidhi, Adv.

Mr. Chandra Prakash, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

C) No. 21650/2012

Respondent No.3 has already filed the counter affidavit.

The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.

Item No.7 2

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent No.2 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of four weeks. Dasti in addition is permitted to be served through the Ld. Standing Counsel representing the State of Chandigarh.

SLP(C) No. 26419/2012

Respondent No.1 has already filed the counter affidavit.

The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.2 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent No. 3 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of four weeks.

SLP(C) No. 30587/2012

The Ld. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules.

Respondent No.13 is reported to be dead. The learned counsel for the petitioners shall within a period of four weeks file an application for substitution to bring on record his Lrs.

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent No.2 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioners within a period of four weeks.

The office report indicates that the learned counsel for the petitioners has filed an application for deletion of respondent Nos. 4 to 24 from the array of the parties which is defective. The learned counsel shall within a period of four weeks rectify the defects whatever have been found in the said application

List again on 1.8.2016.

(M V RAMESH) Registrar

MG

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(44) - 21 Feb 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(43) - 2 Jan 2025

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(42) - 1 Aug 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(41) - 16 Jan 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(40) - 17 Jul 2020

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(39) - 25 Oct 2019

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(38) - 25 Jul 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(37) - 26 Apr 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(36) - 21 Feb 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(35) - 19 Jul 2017

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(33) - 1 May 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(34) - 1 May 2017

ROP

Click to view

Order(30) - 28 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(31) - 28 Oct 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(32) - 28 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(27) - 25 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(28) - 25 Oct 2016

Office Report

Click to view

Order(29) - 25 Oct 2016

ROP

Click to view

Order(25) - 14 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(26) - 14 Sept 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(23) - 1 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(24) - 1 Aug 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(21) - 9 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(22) - 9 May 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(19) - 25 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(20) - 25 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(18) - 4 Aug 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(17) - 30 Jun 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(16) - 25 Apr 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(15) - 4 Apr 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(14) - 28 Jan 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(13) - 7 Jan 2014

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(12) - 13 Nov 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(11) - 21 Aug 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(10) - 2 Jul 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(9) - 26 Apr 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(8) - 9 Apr 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(7) - 4 Mar 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 16 Jan 2013

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 14 Jan 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(4) - 11 Jan 2013

ROP

Click to view

Order(3) - 19 Nov 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 24 Sept 2012

ROP

Click to view

Order(1) - 17 Aug 2012

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view