Barsha Samantray (Minor) Through Her Pairokar vs. State Of Goa

$: 02.09.16$ SECTION XVIA FED ON REGISTRAR COURT: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA GIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ITEM No. TRANSFER PETITION (GIVIL) NO. 049 OF 2015 $\mathcal{M}^{\perp}$ Barsha Samantary (Hones) The her Pairoller's ...Pelilioner ..Respondent $\stackrel{\scriptscriptstyle\mathsf{S}}{=}$ Statiof Groa & Drs. OFFICE REPORT The Transfer Petillon above mentioned was listed before the Hon'ble Court / Ld- $\overline{\phantom{a}}$ Registrar-Court on $8)$ , $8.5$ , 201, when the Court / he was granted / directed. v Piermission to Parte T.P. is granited . Issue motive MOT READY / FOR THE REASON: 1, 2, 5, 4, Accordingly, Nolice was issued to the sole Respondent through Registered A.D. Post on $17.915$ as well as Dasti-/ through Trial Court. 2. It is submitted that unserved cover containing the notice has been received back from sole Respondent with the Postal remarks," Insufficient Juliees." $\sim$ It is submitted that neither A.D. Card not unserved cover has been received Someone It is submitted that A.D. Card duly signed by the sole-Respondent has been $\cdot$ received but no one has filed. Vakaldhama and memo of appearance on his behalf. back from R.No. 8: $\mathcal V$ is submitted that Service Report has been received from the Trial Court stating so far. 6 The counsel has filed an Affidavit of service after effecting Dasit service on the Respondent No. Thas not filed Affidavit of service of dasti notice.<br> $\frac{1}{2}$ , DF is submitted that k: J John & Co. Affin has on 7, 12.15 V/A on behalf of R-NO-S but he has not fitted C/A so for SERVICE OF NOTICE IS NOT COMPLETE: $\mathcal{F} \times \mathcal{R} \times \mathcal{N} \times \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{T}$ . The matter (s) is / are listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this Office Report. :201B. Dated this the $1$ &f. day of $\mathcal{F}$ $\mathcal{F}$ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR "Gopy to: Mr. Sanjack Panigrahe Advocate $018.1311$ Mr. K.J. John XI Co., Advocate ASSISTANT HEGISTRAR