The State Of Tamil Nadu State Of Tamil Nadu By Secy. vs. Pon Elangovan
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
11 Nov 2013
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Listed on. 26.10.2015 Before Ld. Registrar Court No. Item No.
SECTION XII
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL(CIVIL) No. 35520 OF 2013
WITH
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 2-4
(Application for substitution for bringing on record the Lrs. of deceased respondent No. 11, application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application, applcation for setting aside abatement and exemption from filing offical translation)
The State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. ...Petitioners
Pon. Elangovan & Ors. ...Respondents
OFFICE REPORT
Versus
The matters above mentioned were listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on 18th August, 2015, when the following order was passed:-
"Service of respondent Nos.14, 53 and 62 is complete but none has entered appearance.
Service of respondent No.21 is still awaited.
Application for substituting the legal representatives of the deceased respondent No.11 alongwith the condonation of delay is pending adjudication before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers.
Registry to report the status of the remaining respondents as well. List again on 26.10.2015."
It is submitted that there are sixty three respondents. Respondent Nos. 1, 10, 12, 25 to 37, 43 to 45, 49, 52, 54 to 56, 60 and 63 are represented by Mr. Shakun Sharma, Advocate and he has filed counter affidavit on their behalf. Respondent Nos. 5 and 23 are represented by Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra, Advocate, but he has not filed counter affidavit so far. Respondent No. 38 is represented by Mr. L. K. Pandey, Advocate, but he has not filed counter affidavit so far. A.D. cards duly singed have been received back from Respondent Nos. 2 to 4, 6 to 9, 13 to 16, 19, 22, 24, 39, 40-42, 46-48, 50, 51, 53, 57-59, 61 and 62, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. Neither A.D. card nor unserved cover containing notice has been received from respondent Nos. 17, 18, 20 and 21 so far. ...2/-
It is further submitted that in terms of the order quoted above, in the application for substitution for bringing on record the Lrs. of deceased respondent No. 11, application for condonation of delay in filing substitution application, applcation for setting aside abatement and exemption from filing offical translation and the same has already been registered as Interlocutory Application Nos. 2-4 has already been updated in Chamber Pool.
Service is incomplete on Respondent No. 21.
The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court with this office report.
Dated this the 17th day of October, 2015.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
COPY TO: Mr. B. Balaji, Advocate Mr. L.K. Pandey, Advocate Mr. Shakun Sharma, Advocate Mr. Anil Kumar Misra, Advocate
DEPUTY REGISTRAR