Punjab State Agricultural Marketing Board vs. Kanwar Charanjit Singh Sodhi (Dead)

Item No.65

SECTION TVB

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 29155/2015

REGISTRAR COURT. 2

PUNJAB STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD (PUNJAB MANDI <pre>BOARD) Petitioner(s)</pre>

VERSUS

KANWAR CHARANJIT SINGH SODHI & ORS. Respondent(s)

(with appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP and exemption from filing $c/c$ and permission to file additional documents and office report)

WITH SLP(C) No. $29479/2015$ (With (With (With appln.(s) for $c$ /delay in filing SLP and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c and Office Report)

Date: 02/09/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Shree Pal Singh, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Rounak Nayak, Adv. Mr. Rohit Sharma, Adv.

Mr. B. Subrahmanya Prasad, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

C) No. 29155/2015

Service of notice in alternative arrangement is already complete on Respondent No.1. However, Mr. Rounak Nayak, Ld.

Item No.65 2

Advocate has appeared on behalf of respondent No. 1. He seeks and is given two weeks time to file the vakalatnama and four weeks time, as last chance to file the counter affidavit.

Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the respondent No.5 to file the counter affidavit.

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks.

SLP(C) No. 29479/2015

Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.2 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf.

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the respondent Nos. 1 and 3 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of four weeks.

List again on 19.10.2016.

(M V RAMESH) Registrar

MG