P. Thangaraj vs. P. K. Natarajan (Died ) Through Lrs
AI Summary
The Supreme Court of India, on March 5, 2025, considered a Special Leave Petition challenging a Madras High Court judgment. The case, involving P. Thangaraj & Anr. against the legal heirs of P.K. Natarajan, was adjourned to March 26, 2025, at the petitioners' request. This procedural order sets the stage for future substantive hearings on a matter appealed from the High Court.
Case Identifiers
Petitioner's Counsel
Respondent's Counsel
Advocates on Record
eCourtsIndia AITM
Brief Facts Summary
This Special Leave Petition (Civil) challenges a final judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 23-12-2022 in SA No. 50/2017. On March 5, 2025, the petition was called for hearing before a Division Bench of the Supreme Court comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Court adjourned the matter, directing it to be listed on March 26, 2025.
Timeline of Events
Initial case SA No. 50/2017 filed in High Court of Judicature at Madras.
Impugned final judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in SA No. 50/2017.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 19874/2023 filed in Supreme Court of India.
Petition called on for hearing before the Supreme Court; counsel for petitioners requested adjournment.
Next hearing date specified by the Court.
Key Factual Findings
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners requested an adjournment.
Source: Current Court Finding
Petitioner's Arguments
The petitioners' counsel explicitly requested an adjournment for the matter.
Respondent's Arguments
The respondents' counsel appeared, implying they were present to either oppose or not object to the request, or to be present for the hearing. The order does not specify their arguments regarding the adjournment.
Court's Reasoning
The Court decided to list the matter on a future date "At the request of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners."
- Strict Adherence to Procedure
- Fairness to Parties
Impugned Orders
Specific Directions
- 1.List the matter on 26.03.2025.
Precedential Assessment
Non-Binding (Procedural)
This order is purely procedural, merely adjourning the case, and does not delve into any substantive legal issues or lay down any new principles of law. Thus, it has no precedential value.
Tips for Legal Practice
Legal Tags
Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.31 COURT NO.8 SECTION XII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19874/2023
[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-12-2022 in SA No. 50/2017 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras]
P. THANGARAJ & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
P.K. NATARAJAN (DIED ) THROUGH LRS & ANR. Respondent(s)
Date : 05-03-2025 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Adv. (NP) Mr. M.P. Parthiban, AOR Mr. Ankur Prakash, Adv. Mrs. Priyanka Singh, Adv. Mr. Bilal Mansoor, Adv. Mr. Shreyas Kaushal, Adv. Mr. S. Geyolin Selvam, Adv. Mr. Alagiri K, Adv.
- For Respondent(s) Mr. Gaurav Agarwal, Sr. Adv. Ms. R. Shase, AOR Mr. K.panner Selvam, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
At the request of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, list the matter on 26.03.2025.
(SWETA BALODI) (POONAM VAID)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
