Vineet Dhanda vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Home Affairs Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
16 Aug 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR DR. K.ARUL Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 760/2014 VINEET DHANDA Petitioner( VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for permission to file additional documents and office report) Date : 01/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Amrendra Kumar Singh, Adv. Dr. J. P. Dhanda,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Saakaar Sardana, Adv. Mr. Anip Sachthey,Adv. Mr. V. Senthil Kumar, Adv. Mr. D. S. Mahra,Adv. Mr. V. N. Raghupathy,Adv. Mr. Sapam Biswajit Meitei, Adv. Mr. Z.H. Isaac Haiding, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Shubhado Deshpande, Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Balajit Srinivasan, Adv. Mr. K. Enatoli Sema, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Service on respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4 is awaited, as per the office report. Dasti is permitted, as prayed for. Counter affidavit has not yet been filed by respondent Nos.5 and 8, despite Hon'ble Court's order. Signature Not Verified Respondent No.6 though filed counter affidavit but Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2014.12.04 vakalatnama not yet filed by the learned counsel. 17:19:51 IST Reason: Two weeks' time is granted for filing the vakalatnama for respondent No.6. Item No.46 -2-
The learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 9 has
Z ITEM NO.46 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION P
IL W
s)
chosen to file counter affidavit for respondent No.9 only and not for respondent No.2 and the same is also defective. Two weeks' time is granted for curing the defects in the counter affidavit.
Vakalatnama has been filed by respondent No.7 - State of Tamilnadu.
List again on 4.2.2015.
(DR. K. ARUL) Registrar