K. N Suseelan (Dead Through Lrs) vs. Sreedharan Pillai
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
14 Sept 2013
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
J ITEM NO.25 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION X IA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 29286/2013 K.N SUSEELAN DEAD AND ORS. Petitioner(s) VERSUS SREEDHARAN PILLAI & ORS Respondent(s) WITH SLP(C) No. 35059/2013 (With Office Report) Date : 11/02/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. E. M. S. Anam,Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sanand Ramakrishnan,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) NO.35059/2013 The Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has mentioned that respondent nos. 5 to 13, 15,17,18 with respect to whom fresh particulars were to be furnished are to be deleted. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has not filed application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent nos. 16 and 18. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Hema Joshi Date: 2015.02.17 11:40:43 IST Reason: Service is complete for respondent No.14 but no one has put in appearance. Time is requested for moving appropriate application. -2- Item No.25 Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, who are petitioner in connected matter, are required to file vakalatnama and
counter affidavit.
SLP(C) NO.29286/2013
Petitioner has failed to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos. 4,6,11 to 17 despite last opportunity warned. Further opportunity is therefore declined. Petitioner has failed to file the application for substitution in respect of deceased respondent Nos. 2,5 and 7 despite last opportunity. Further opportunity is therefore declined.
Petitioner is also required to cure the defects in the application moved for substitution of legal representatives of deceased petitioner No.1.
After receiving the application, if any, filed in the registry with respect to deletion as mentioned in 35059/2013, matter be placed before the Hon'ble Judge in Chamber for further directions.
(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar