Ammoda Developers And Promoters Pvt Ltd vs. M Anji Reddy

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble J.K. Maheshwari, K.V. Viswanathan
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:2 Jan 2024
CNR:SCIN010260502023

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

2 Jan 2024

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.49 COURT NO.9 SECTION XII-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No. 26050/2023

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30-01-2023 in WA No. 781/2022 30-01-2023 in WA No. 821/2022 passed by the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad)

AMMODA DEVELOPERS AND PROMOTERS PVT LTD & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

M ANJI REDDY & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.245355/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.245357/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.245356/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.245354/2023-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)

Date : 02-01-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSHU DHULIA

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ravindra Shrivastava, Sr. Adv. Mr. D. Abhinav Rao, AOR Mr. P. Sathwik Reddy, Adv. Mr. Rahul Jajoo, Adv. Ms. Prerna Robin, Adv. Mr. Devadipta Das, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Delay in filing and refiling the special leave petition is condoned.

Digitally signed by Nidhi Ahuja Date: 2024.01.03 17:03:55 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

After hearing learned senior counsel appearing on behalf

of the petitioners, we are not inclined to entertain these special

leave petitions arising out of interim proceedings. Accordingly, the special leave petitions are dismissed. Pending applications stand disposed of.

However, we request the High Court to expedite the hearing.

It is made clear here that the observation, if any, made in the order impugned would not be an impediment while deciding the case on merits.

(NIDHI AHUJA) (VIRENDER SINGH) AR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER