V. Venkateshwarlu vs. K. Mallaiah

LItem No.36 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M V RAMESH Civil Appeal No(s). 6020/2015 V. VENKATESHWARLU Appellant(s) VERSUS K. MALLAIAH & ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and stay of the impugned order and office report) WITH C.A. No. 6073/2015 (With (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and appln.(s) for stay and Office Report) C.A. No. 6291/2015 (With appln.(s) for ad-interim ex-parte stay and Office Report) C.A. No. 6292/2015 (With appln.(s) for ad-interim ex-parte stay and Office Report) Date : 20/10/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today. For Appellant(s) Ms. Tatini Basu,Adv. Mr. C. S. N. Mohan Rao,Adv. Mr. Amit K. Nain,Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Ram Swarup Sharma,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R C.A. No. 6020/2015 The Office Report indicates that although by Order dated 6.9.2016 of this Court three weeks time, as last chance was given to the learned counsel for the appellant for filing the affidavit Item No.36 2 in proof of dasti service of notice issued to the unserved respondents, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter. C.A. No. 6073/2015 The office report further indicates that although by order dated 6.9.2016 of this Court four weeks time as last chance was given to the Learned Counsel for the appellant to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent No.3, yet he has not done the needful within the period stipulated in the order. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter. C.A. Nos. 6291 and 6292/2015 Ld. Counsel for the appellant has failed to take fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondents despite opportunities. Viewed in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further future directions. Await orders. List thereafter. (M V RAMESH)

Registrar MG